Re: Existence of life
One would have thought that you have already heard the vast majority of the beliefs about God - in order to be objective for rejecting the concept. If you have rejected something prior to understanding it then that is clearly an act against science and against common sense in law and other logical frameworks. Rejections should be made on things that clearly defy reason after careful investigations have been undertaken.
This is why I can’t understand the attitude of those who claim to follow “science” but do not want to engage or are unable to … and criticise religious people for doing the very thing they themselves are doing … which is faith …
Believing the words of a scientist without oneself testing the evidence is purely being reliant on “human third person testimony” - that is the basis for most religions too … the difference is in religious cases we assess to see if the people concerned are known to be trustworthy and show they do not have vested interests … conversely many scientists want glory and fame and fortune for their recognition and I can’t vouch for their character until I can say that I know them.
Well thank you for your time …