Re: Existence of life
Lots of opinion, anecdotes, and hearsay, but still no evidence. This is faith. If you had evidence you wouldn’t need faith. That why it’s called a religion.
Fortunately, science sets a much higher bar for it’s self…and we’re all better for it. Science relies on evidence, data, and then people reach a consensus and agreement. It doesn’t require faith. It’s immune from arguments or those orally gifted with words. It’s truths are evident from the weight of it’s own correctness. Religion doesn’t even come close…
Lets forget all the people in the world. Lets look at people that claim to share the same religion you do. Can you show me consensus on exactly what your holy book means from…let’s say…80% or it’s adherents? Evolution is almost universally accepted, more than 99%, by scientists.
As to your last point: Natural selection.
Another point, I’ve made before: You have no counter theory. There is no religious theory that explains the data remotely as close as evolution does. There is no basis for your argument, barring a religious one. You have zero evidence.