Existence of life

[Theorist]

Re: Existence of life

@psyah

If something is neither true nor false then it is not always right … It is as you said … Neither true nor false … Or neither right nor wrong … That should be simple.But this not the case here … We are talking about whether something can be shown to be right or wrong … If it can’t be shown to be wrong then it is possible to be true until a point that it can be shown to be wrong or false.

Key word. Possible but not yet true.. Therefore, it is neither right nor wrong.

I said Agnostic view is always right because it claims nothing! No one can argue if you hold agnostic position in a debate. It is inconclusive. It is kind of like Schneider’s thought experiment. Is the cat dead or alive? We don’t know until the box is opened. I can write two books on it: one stating the cat is alive because of such and such. The other book will note reasons why the cat must be dead. Which book is correct and evident? Neither. God works the same way because we are trying to understand a power/force that is beyond us, unseen and unheard.