You’re not using my definition of anything. You’re transposing words, and then insisting that it’s my definition. That’s not the case. The way you’re using the word ‘science’, is incorrect:* I declare that I have ‘science’ in Islam
*
You’re welcome to claim whatever you like! But where is the evidence? Where is your data? You can’t use a book as the veracity of it’s own claims.
So, just to be clear: What you’re saying is that you’re using a bronze age book to verify it’s self, you have no evidence of a diety, and you cannot provide evidence for a deity. All you have is faith that your holy book is more miraculous than all the other miraculous holy books.
They are working all the time. Some have a more profound effect at a certain time than others.