sister, please don’t even try it, we’ve gone over this before. Can you bring something to prove your claim and please appeal to those, who are hujjah for us? btw, we had a surprise in store for you people (Sunni Response Where is Allah: Hanabli Butcher + Blind Taqleed + Ash’aris/Maturidis); SF people were bamboozled by it before they decided to delete it.
what about 8 taraweeh? Did the scholars of fiqh not differ over this issue or any other issue for that matter?
Wa’alaykum As-Salam akhee
where did you get this from? Books of ahadeeth have all sorts of narrations! How does this prove that Umar’s (radiAllahu anho) statements is to be understood as sharee’ ruling? There is a difference between lingustic definition of bid’ah and sharee’ definition of bid’ah.
when did I not present the scholar’s opinions but my own personal understanding? No one is asking you to buy what the article say, if you like it good and if you don’t then it is your choice. No one is obliged to present the other view when it is known that they think it is deviant. Which scholars are you talking about? Can they be hujjah to everyone?
1 - this is not an issue of fiqh where opposite opinion can be tolerated; it is more or less an aqeedah issue
2 - what is the view of the jamhour or what is the ijma’?
3 - What’s the point of quoting the other opinion if you blast it with your arguments in the same article? How does that propose tolerance and unity? Please read carefully the works of ibn Kathir (rahimahullah); he blasted the people of kalam (Ash’aris, etc.) through out his tafseer and al Bidayah wa-Nihayah. I don’t know how that was tolerant or displaying unity.
this has been narrated in bukhari, ask your other shia brother to quote it for you
I’ve already explained it and I don’t understand why two shias are making big fuss about it when you don’t even believe in sunni ahadeeth books.
edited