In societies like Pakistan even if a woman is financially supporting a family, she still has to, and generally is expected to, fulfill all other responsibilities that are accepted as norms. For example she has to prepare breakfast for the members of the family that may include MIL and FIL and/or a few other extended family members.
She has to arrange for lunch and supper, make sure cleanliness of home, and kids. She has to make sure that all the social relations that might be to primary to her husband and secondary to her are given equal or better attention.
She hardly gets any appreciation for financial support, hardly ever gets appreciation for making up and taking care of the family unit.
One can argue that it is easy for a working lady to arrange for a mate or servant, a butler and a sweeper for all the responsibilities, fact of the matter is that in a vast majority of such households where first lady of the house is working is not because of a need is appreciated by the woman herself to use her skills or to pursue a career, it is rather a mutual appreciation of family members that it is imperative for the woman to help and support working male of the family to keep up with the living standards.
In most of these situations an effort to arrange a helper for the household responsibilities is generally contested by other needs, interests and extended family members, unless the gap between what is expected to be paid to the helper and what is earned by the lady is huge.
I will comment on the rest of your your reply later. How about emancipation of a western lady, is she really free from all forms of subjugations, or this slogan is a sugar coted poison to entrap her?