Election record of NA-128 & PP-160 missing: DRO

[Amal]

Re: Election record of NA-128 & PP-160 missing: DRO

@Anwer_Pasha

1. ECP said that the differences in the numbers of votes was due to a typing mistake and no further meetings were needed.

Let us accept what the ECP has found out. But it remains anyone’s guess how many such “typing errors” would have become part of the official election record.

Secondly, should there be a way to avoid recurrence of such “typing errors”?

Thirdly, should the ECP assure that no “typing error” is monetized?

Fourthly, must a politician come on streets to move the ECP?

And lastly, is it still a crime to demand an overhaul of the ECP and election reforms?