Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
That’s true. The flood myth appears in other parts of the world, outside the Abrahamic religions. The Sumerians mention the flood in their story about Gilgamesh.
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
Peace Ghost14
When we say something a myth, it generally means a word of mouth spread over the period. No doubts myths from one area coincide with the myths of people living far away from those area due to human mobility because of trade and whatever reasons.
But in case of Noah’s flood, Quranic version that it happened to people of Noah (living in Mesopotamia) is supported by Archeology and latest excavations.
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
Noah's story is very much similar to Manu, Raja Manu was king of Draviddesh. He was very righteous king, Lord vishnu took Matsyavtar and guided his boat which had Manu along with his wife shraddha, nine variety of seeds and pair of every bird and beast, his descendents are called Manav means Humans
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
Noah's story is very much similar to Manu, Raja Manu was king of Draviddesh. He was very righteous king, Lord vishnu took Matsyavtar and guided his boat which had Manu along with his wife shraddha, nine variety of seeds and pair of every bird and beast, his descendents are called Manav means Humans
In Sindhi Manhoo (seems a variation of Manu / Manav) is also humans.
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
Noah's story is very much similar to Manu, Raja Manu was king of Draviddesh. He was very righteous king, Lord vishnu took Matsyavtar and guided his boat which had Manu along with his wife shraddha, nine variety of seeds and pair of every bird and beast, his descendents are called Manav means Humans
In Sindhi Manhoo (seems a variation of Manu / Manav) is also humans.
English word 'man' also derives from this name Manu/Manav.
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
English word 'man' also derives from this name Manu/Manav.
And its also the part of hu*man*
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
Have you seen Hazrat Ibrahim's paaye mubarak in Khana Kabaa they are really big, it can tell that human beings were big and tall at olden days.
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
Have you seen Hazrat Ibrahim's paaye mubarak in Khana Kabaa they are really big, it can tell that human beings were big and tall at olden days.
and lived for hundreds years. As per Surah Nuh, Hazrat Nuh preached his nation for 950 years. What the new research says about about this?
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
^Are you guys talking about Adam’s Peak?
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
No
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
Does any of the religious books mentioned this place in Sri Lanka. As far as I know, Quran does not talk about the place on earth where Adam (As) was sent? But its probably In Iraq. Recently one of my friend went for Ziarat to Iraq and he told me that Hazrat Adam’s grave is in Najaf.
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
^that’s according to shia belief, sunni think it’s in makkah and jews think it’s Jerusalem. I don’t know about Sripada (Adam’s Peak).
Here’s a list of burial places of biblical figures according to Abrahamic religion.
Re: Does Archeology Support Religion
In Sindhi Manhoo (seems a variation of Manu / Manav) is also humans.
Sindhi is closest to sanskrit than any nothern language of sub continent.
Have you seen Hazrat Ibrahim's paaye mubarak in Khana Kabaa they are really big, it can tell that human beings were big and tall at olden days.
and lived for hundreds years. As per Surah Nuh, Hazrat Nuh preached his nation for 950 years. What the new research says about about this?
According to Hindu belief, In satyug people used to be very tall, she krishna took mokhsa (death) in his middle age of 128 years.