Did you hear about censorship? Not if you rely on the mainstream media, says Cynthia

Did you hear about censorship? Not if you rely on the mainstream media, says Cynthia Mckenney

By John Sugg

Creative Loafing

10/17/03

Last weekend, Cynthia McKinney made a speech in San Rafael, Calif., about journalism. That you won’t read anything about the talk – or the underlying theme, censorship – in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution isn’t surprising. After all, McKinney faced unrelenting and corrosive distortion – a form of censorship – from the AJC during her years representing Georgia’s 4th Congressional District.

McKinney was the keynote speaker at the annual dinner of Project Censored, which for 27 years has proclaimed that the emperor – in this case, Big Media – isn’t wearing clothes.

Getting all of the news, the many sides of the news, is essential for freedom to survive, McKinney told the crowd. Her message underscored the fact that the most censored stories this year dealt with an organized, concerted undermining of America’s democracy and our liberties by the creepy and fanatical bunch whose hands are not only on the levers of political power but are also poised over the red buttons that could launch a nuclear Armageddon.

Censored – as defined by the Sonoma State University sponsors of the project – doesn’t mean government bully-boys smashing apart printing presses. Nor does it mean bureaucrats snipping stories from newspaper pages or banning books from libraries.

The perversity of the media is such that the press cuts off its own cojones – and the proof is obvious from the awful, jingoistic, brain-dead coverage of the Iraq war.

Censorship in America today is the result of corporate Big Media becoming an “entertainment business,” says Peter Phillips, a Sonoma sociology professor who heads Project Censored. “The press has abdicated its First Amendment obligation to tell us about important news stories about what the powerful people and institutions are doing.”

Nor do the corporate press lords – such as the Atlanta Coxopoly – want you to know just how miserably bad their coverage is. So, despite the awards to those who have overcome censorship, and an annual book that goes in depth into what wasn’t reported – the daily newspapers and TV stations studiously ignore Project Censored.

“No, you’ll never see us mentioned in the New York Times,” Phillips says. “But each year, the Times’ reporters post our list of stories on their bulletin board.”

This year’s No. 1 censored story is “The Neo-Conservative Plan for Global Dominance.” For more than a decade, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and the other neo-cons have been formulating their scheme for conquest. Once in power, their dreams of empire became national policy: pre-emptive war, military dominance, unilateralism, more nukes, the conquest of Iraq. It was all spelled out long before the 2000 election, but the mainstream press simply didn’t pay attention – and still isn’t.

In the AJC, there have been exactly four opinion columns that mention the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) – the neo-con’s umbrella organization – and delve into its strategy. Absolutely no AJC reporting resources were devoted to covering the story as news. Global domination vs. two hockey players in a car crash – you know where the AJC will send its reporters.

Even more astounding is the way the media (with a few exceptions) have put on the blinders when it comes to a 2000 document from the PNAC that wistfully said all that was needed to shove its agenda into high gear was “some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” And guess what happened a year later?

(Don’t bother looking for that zinger in the woebegone AJC.)

Here are the other Top 10 Project Censored stories:

  • Homeland Security Threatens Civil Liberty. From the obsessive secrecy of the Bush administration, to its compulsion to know everything it can about citizens, to the PATRIOT Act that unleashed the feds to spy and snoop with little regard for rights, to proposed “enhancements” of PATRIOT that will permit the government to criminalize dissent and to strip citizenship from Americans, 9-11 has been used as an excuse to give freedom a kick in the ass.

  • U.S. Illegally Removes Pages From Iraq U.N. Report. Oh, so you didn’t know that the Bushies – after accusing Saddam Hussein of providing an incomplete report on his weapons – had illegally removed 8,000 pages of the 11,800-page Iraq report? The deleted pages fingered 24 American corporations – and the Reagan and first Bush administrations – with illegally supplying Iraq with banned weapons during the 1980s.

  • Rumsfeld’s Plan to Provoke Terrorists. The Pentagon’s “Proactive Pre-emptive Operations Group” is tasked with provoking militant groups into committing violent acts that would then expose them to “counterattack” by U.S. forces.

  • The Effort to Make Unions Disappear. Big business has long yearned to gut unions, redistribute wealth from the working and middle classes upwards to the very rich, and undermine employment and workplace protections. With George Bush, business met its fairy godmother.

  • Closing Access to Information Technology. So you think the Internet is freedom’s great frontier? Silly you. In a few years, today’s 7,000 internet service providers will have disappeared, replaced by a handful of companies controlled by the cable, satellite and phone companies.

  • Treaty Busting by the United States. Not since the days of ripping up treaties with Native American tribes has this nation so aggressively proven that it speaks with forked tongue. We have violated nine treaties we have signed.

  • U.S./British Forces Continue Use of Depleted Uranium Weapons Despite Massive Evidence of Negative Health Effects. Depleted uranium shells are regarded by the civilized world as illegal weapons of mass destruction. They have resulted in high levels of death and cancer in Iraq since the first Gulf War. There is a statistical anomaly in the large number of Gulf War I veterans who have died – many with symptoms that point to depleted uranium. So, the Pentagon asks as it bombards Iraq with even more DU shells, what’s the problem?

  • In Afghanistan: Poverty, Women’s Rights and Civil Disruption Worse Than Ever. And you thought all of the Afghans were getting fat and happy?

  • Africa Faces Threat of New Colonialism. The G-8 nations – aka the world’s economic superpowers, which will be meeting on Georgia’s Sea Island in June – have an “anti-poverty” plan for Africa. But the G-8ers forgot two things: They didn’t ask the Africans; and they didn’t mention that the scheme allows exploitation of the continent’s resources.

You can learn about these stories at www.projectcensored.org (hell, you know you won’t read them in the AJC). And, you’ll find the scoops on the runners-up – stories such as the Bush administration’s role in the failed coup in Venezuela, how corporations convicted of crimes get perks instead of punishment, and the Pentagon’s plan to outsource killing to private contractors.

http://www.aljazeerah.info/17%20o/Did%20you%20hear%20about%20censorship.htm

Comment:

I thought Iraq under Saddam was a police state where the media was censored but America it seems is just the same where only controlled opposition is allowed, so much for freedom of speech.

So more censorship on the horizon - in the universities no less - in the form of cutting-off of federal funds to those who do not toe the neocon line (lies?). Wake up American public.

“The New Commissars

neocon think tanks have waged a three-part battle against the academy. First it was necessary to popularize the view of universities across the country as an unmitigated breeding ground for “terrorist thought.” This was accompanied by the monitoring of scholars and institutions that expressed criticism of Israel and of U.S. foreign policy (i.e., “anti-Semitic” and “anti-American” views), “naming and shaming” them on the Internet and in columns and editorials. While thus “raising public awareness,” Congress was being lobbied for legislation to confront the threat from this enemy within: the fifth column in the ivory tower.
The pieces came together on Oct. 21, when the House approved the International Studies in Higher Education Act, HR 3077. If passed into law, the bill would mandate the withdrawal of federal funding from international-studies departments that fail to display sufficient support for U.S. foreign-policy positions, do not contribute to homeland security, or fall short of federally mandated standards for “diversity” of political perspectives.

Federal funding of international studies—known as Title VI funding—dates back to 1965, when the tensions of the Cold War created a need for greater understanding of the world.

Even though the funding program was established at a time when fear of communism and the Soviet threat was peaking, the personal political views of academics were not an issue.
The politicization of Title VI funding came about when pro-Israel interest groups grew concerned with criticism of that country.

While there are doubtless problems in academia, that scholars have views is not one of them. HR 3077 talks of diversity but rather aims to mute criticism of the neocon agenda. If their concern were truly to enhance national security, the neocons—not known for their adversity to spending tax dollars on “urgent matters”—would presumably have proposed that another 0.005 percent of the federal budget be appropriated to fund terrorism studies. Instead, they attempt to strangle the funding of those whose views they disagree with.

The whole mess would be simply trivial if it weren’t true that wherever political commissars are put in place to regulate the academic debate, the debate tends to suffer.”
http://amconmag.com/2_2_04/article.html