aahhhh…atlast we have some one who can talk in “indian” language. Sharafat kee zuban samajhtey hee nahee yee loog jitna release do utna sar per charh jatey heen…Go Akram go
Who reports on what the Kashmiris opressed and occupied by India really think? Just look at the Indian news reports, when they want to report on the peoples’ views, they grab a hindu, never a muslim, do you know why???
I am a Kashmiri, from the Azad side, and Mr James’Bund, we will fight the Indians, we will fight, and fight until we are totally free!!!
i am sure they dont want to be with both
because of religen they got stuck with pakistan. kashmiris are not naturally anti-indian but pakistan suceeded in making them so.
[quote]
Originally posted by rvikz: i am sure they dont want to be with both
because of religen they got stuck with pakistan. kashmiris are not naturally anti-indian but pakistan suceeded in making them so.
[/quote]
So who made the Tamil's unnaturally against Sri Lanka?
Kashmiri people should be free to choose and excercise their own rights. Human rights is natural believe it or not Rvikz.
[quote]
Originally posted by Alpha1:
** So who made the Tamil's unnaturally against Sri Lanka?
Kashmiri people should be free to choose and excercise their own rights. Human rights is natural believe it or not Rvikz.**
[/quote]
i understand unfortunatley kashmiris become pawns in india/pakiatan rivalry.
british could have left the whole thing with pakistan we would not have this problem now.
[quote]
Originally posted by rvikz:
** i understand unfortunatley kashmiris become pawns in india/pakiatan rivalry.
british could have left the whole thing with pakistan we would not have this problem now.**
[/quote]
So why not allow a referendum and obey the wishes of the people. Its never too late to correct the wrongs of the Brits.
Rvikz or watever, What are the 750,000 troops doing along Kashmirs border. With so many troops they cant stop infilteration. Very mighty stupid claim.
I mean Kashmir border is not that damn long, where 750,000 troops cant keep a vigil. Those attacks on Indian barracks happen from IOK inhabitants. They are fighting the Indian army, admit it ur army and troops are disgraceful, common militants make them piss there pants and have the guts to blow them up while ur 750,000 troops sit there playing with their uncircumcised dicks.
Pakistan may not have as much power as India but certainly enough to taken as a serious threat. Numbers are not everything, guts count also. As someone mentioned earlier, Pakistani civilian are armed well enough to back their forces anytime whereas ur Indian public can soak up ur soldiers sweat in cow piss.
Its better to die fighting than live under oppression. So India is dreaming about ebcoming a super power someday, it wont happen if they go to war with Pakistan, we can put u decades back. And after a nuclear war, u think India will be attractive for foreign investors and inhabitors I think not, ur dreaming. Even bangladesh would be able piss on an Indian from across there border after a war.
india has to loose lot of land and what we will get back all the minorities in kashmir.
the hostility of pakistan will not end there will be no free trade or anytother relationship. crossborder activites will
move to much closer to home. there is no incentive for settlement and it is too late.
this a a conflict of civilisation and kashmir is the symptom.
[This message has been edited by rvikz (edited May 30, 2002).]
[quote]
Originally posted by rvikz:
**india has to loose lot of land and what we will get back all the minorities in kashmir.
the hostility of pakistan will not end there will be no free trade or anytother relationship. crossborder activites will
move to much closer to home. there is no incentive for settlement and it is too late.
this a a conflict of civilisation and kashmir is the symptom.
[This message has been edited by rvikz (edited May 30, 2002).]**
[/quote]
Rivk, our messgae is very simple, and it goes out to every fundementalist and extremist hindu. Let us be free, or we shall continue our struggle and fight you until there is no more kashmiri left to fight.
You know what? Kashmir will lead to the downfall of India. First Kashmir, than Khalistan, Bihar.........................
[quote]
Originally posted by rvikz: we are being punished for keeping kshamiri identity. imagine if you are provinse of china you identity would have been erased
long time ago.
[/quote]
You are being punished for opressing an entire people in the name of hindu extremism and fundementalism.
Another crazy nut from the Brit Enoch Powell famously said:
*** ... when the gods want to destroy a nation, they first make the nation go mad ***
India has gone mad in thinking that it can opress the Kasmiris. This will lead to thier destruction (Either all its states becomming independant or nuclear anhiliation along with Pakistan).
kashmir is settled by kashmiris no indian can buy property including indian muslims.
if trouble makers across pakistan stops
incursioins indian army wont be there.
kashmiris wont even feel they are part of india. what else you want?
can you recall the years after simla agreement there was peace at that time.
you dont even have to live with kashmiri pandits.
[This message has been edited by rvikz (edited May 30, 2002).]
Free from whom? Pakistan? Kashmir doesn’t only belong to Muslims, but also to Hindus. And one should not decide the fate of a country by religion. India has the second largest Muslim population; does it mean we should send all the Muslims to Pakistan and Azad Kashmir?
“It is better to do thine own duty, however lacking in merit, than to do that of another, even though efficiently. It is better to die doing one’s own duty, for to do the duty of another is fraught with danger.”
i can understand a situation where kashmiri
people are against india for settling non-kashmiris and stealing their land. this is not occuring. the problem is human rights violation as in any independant movement
should be adressed. indian,kashmiris and
miltants across from the border are all
part and parcel of the problem. indians are not stealing the resouces of kashmir
and river water is supplied to pakistan at the expense of local kashmiris(we can build
power palants). pvert level is lowest of any state in india. just compare kashmir and bihar
[quote]
Originally posted by rvikz: i can understand a situation where kashmiri
people are against india for settling non-kashmiris and stealing their land. this is not occuring. the problem is human rights violation as in any independant movement
should be adressed. indian,kashmiris and
miltants across from the border are all
part and parcel of the problem. indians are not stealing the resouces of kashmir
and river water is supplied to pakistan at the expense of local kashmiris(we can build
power palants). pvert level is lowest of any state in india. just compare kashmir and bihar
[/quote]
This whole mess has arisen because Nehru ordered his forces to invade and steal the land from the people. He stole thier right to choose. What about the states where the nawabs wanted to join Pakistan and India took them by force cause their populations were mostly Hindu (was Gujrat one of them?)?
Such double standards hold very little weight, especially when India has been training and assisting the Tamil Tigers.
And yes we want freedom, freedom to choose between India, Pakistan, or indipendance.
In any case, whichever choice is made, it will be a free choice, and that in itself is what we call FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[This message has been edited by Alpha1 (edited May 31, 2002).]