I apologize for over estimating your intellect.
My friend, the point I made was that providing security for a person or group of people is way better in Pakistan than in India. When Pakistanis know that a certain person (a president or PM) or group of people are to be protected, then their record shines way better than the Indians.
THREE heads of state!!!
Comprende amigo?
Buddy, your knowledge of Indian socio-politics comes across as flippant at best.
First of all you talk about the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi.....that happened SIXTY YEARS ago for Christ's sake...and technically he was not even a "Head Of State" at that time. And as Bitter says above, even Rajiv Gandhi was only an Opposition leader at the time of his killing.
You can spin your argument any way you want in order to escape from the back door, but the fact remains that those reponsible for the assasinations of Indian leaders bore no grudge against foreigners (Western World)......and that is what this thread is about.
I will reteirate - the Aussies may have the "dollars aspect" in mind when they agreed to tour India - but from a logical point of view, there is absolutely no doubt that the security situation in India for a *gora *foreigner is still way better than in Pak.