Dawn supporting Indian position on Kashmir?

Yeah, what can you expect when you are surrounded by a million unbathed Indians and your thousands of Miles from your own territory and running out of supplies.

Again, has nothing to do with Indias fighting capacity and everything to do with circumstance. The Pak army was sent to put down an uprising in one of its own provinces, not fight an all out war.

Exactly.. So please Shut up! :stuck_out_tongue:

And thats why they decided to surrender to India - not 1 or 2, but 90,000 of them :rotfl:

Anyway, keep rambling…

Punjabee…plz stop answering to this guy’s replies…as usual this guys replies do not make sense …this guy need some serious treatment…

You are stinking even more with your rotten mind and ideology..what can we expect from you?

Look...what this guy (anil Khan) is talking about other religions and their faiths?..

Well lets us check the score …

for Pakistani intrusion in 1965 … India intruded “deep” inside east Pakistan … ejecting them from that land … forever !!!

for displacing 300,000 kashmiri pandits … more then 3 million have been ejected from tribal areas … and counting !!!

Mumabi hotels … settled with Islamabad and Peshawar hotels !!!

dont know why you bring Kargil … you had to vacate in end … while India still is in full control of Siachin …

so tell me what have to got now … :smiley:

What happend to 1 muslim equal to 100 hindus .... or you need "supplies" for that :D

Next time do inform the Indians that you are not there for war ...... or simple dont take panga !!!!!

Umm, I guess the Indian stench is that overwhelming… :stuck_out_tongue:

Actually its 1 Pakistani=10 Indians. Lets not turn this into a religious debate.

And that number only applies when the circumstances are such that the fight remains fair otherwise…

If you cant accept facts for what they are, thats not my problem. India so called victory in East Pakistan had absolutely nothing to do with Indian fighting capacity…
Pakistan did not go into the East Pakistan to fight India… Fact is fact. If it doesnt fit your skewed understandng of history it has nothing to do with us.

But continue to clutch your straws. We all know how well you have done in actual wars… The Chinese literally raped you, and the Pakistanis fought you to a standstill despite being 1/10 your size…
So basically, all you midgets have left is the lucky fluke in East Pakistan:hehe:

Actually it was the Indians that took “panga.” But that typical of Indians.
But again, dont tout that so much. Do remember that we attacked you in Kargil, and attacked your parliament and Mumbai. And despite all that “panga” you have done absolutely nothing. The bottom line is tat India is a nation of cowards:)

Re: Dawn supporting Indian position on Kashmir?

something to think about…the last 20 odd seconds..

good to see your heartfelt love for Bengoliz :omg:

Welcome back Anil bhai :bb:

Thanks brother :slight_smile:

Back to defend Pakistan.

Re: Dawn supporting Indian position on Kashmir?

Well both terrirtories are occupied technically.. one side by indians and other side by pakistanis.

Re: Dawn supporting Indian position on Kashmir?

POK could be Pakistan-Owned Kashmir too- but yeah I don't like Dawn too.

yes because Jang , Geo , Jews

are doing their best for.................................................

Dawn, Geo, Aaj, Jang are very Indian-dominated news media. We should ask common Pakistanis about the pulse of Pakistan or go and talk to a Mufti

Re: Dawn supporting Indian position on Kashmir?

Pakistan was a colonizer in '71 and still is in the tribal areas.