Rise of Mahatma gandhi in 1915 after successful South African struggle was challenge to everyone including MA Jinnah, after Mahatma rise Jinnah went back to London and returned with idea of pakistan.
It was bengalis who revolted against it, various movement most notably young bengal movement was reason of reunification, one thing is of note, Bengal was among the few state where pundas were Zamindars:) and atrocity commited by Zamindars is well known, muslims in Bengal were mostly poor farmer, but this partition didn’t acheive the basic goal hence Bengalis reverted back to Bengal.
This is what is what I feel is true reality:k:
Intially congress had dual memebership, one can be member of Hindu Mahasabha and Congress but dual membership with league wasn’t acceptable,after Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, longest president of INC, registered his opposition, dual membership was completely closed.
Yes Some dalits I beleive like jadunath Sarkar, Jinnah claimed League as sole representative of muslims in Simla 1946 conference but paradoxically appointed a hindu dalit leader as representative of muslim league:)
Wrong idea. it was congress who stood with ali brothers during khilafat movement, majority of muslims were member of congress, in UP, poor class muslims, lower caste, supported congress and Zamindar caste muslims supported League, Muslim Legue was party of elite class muslims, none of them had international stature of Mahatma, neither were any of them were capable of launching pan india movement like gandhi could.
The intereim goverment gave department of finance to Liaquat ali khan, Maulana Abul kalam Azad’s cabinet mission plan was based on provincial autonomy, which meant muslim majority areas will be governed by muslims, but liaquat ali khan created problem as even a peon cannot get appointed without his permission. Most enthusiastic muslims who loved League were Hindustani speakers, but Jinnah got pakistan and moved to karchi, leaving many of them to migr