Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

Hangout GupShup Cafe
21

Re: Can Darwin’s supporters answer this ?

but is it possible that the scientists that claim that early human beign were different and have evolved sumhow found sum entirely different specie:hmmm:

for example they show skulls and stuff but is it possible that those skulls r not human?:hmmm: they r sum other species that got extinct :hmmm: cuz they r not sure whether those r human skeleton or jst sum animal they cuz r jst assuming right? :hmmm:

still thinkin… :hmmm:

22

Re: Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

^ When they thought it was human bone they had many similarities in it with present human.

Also Darwin's tubercle is one reason why he thought 'his' ancestors were monkeys. ;-)

23

Re: Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

The world is only 6000 years old, so how can man have existed 20000 years ago?

Theory disproven on Gupshup.

24

I guess future people will be very ghastly.
Because, their height will reduce.
I guess.

25

^ LOL

but similarities really doesnt prove anything. similarities can be found with many other species too. so it really doesnt mean that it IS a human bone/skull watever jst because t is similar.

and scisntists mostly are really optimistic ppl they ignore the differences and empahsize on single similarity if they find one. they will ignore hundred other differences and try to prove their theories.

so billi is still thinking… real hard…:hmmm:

26

Re: Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

mirch, evolution isnt some magic by which humans will morph into X-men in short period of time.

it is a lot less glam and boring. in a nutshell, whenever the environment a bunch of ppl live in changes, only the ones who are capable of surviving in that environment will live on.

we are all not alike in many small ways. for eg., some of us are more resistant to skin cancer than others, say darker-skinned people. if the ozone layer gets depleted enough in the future, those more prone to skin cancers would die out, and it would likely lead mankind to evolve into a darker skin in a few generations.

so, environmental change is usually the driver of natural selection. and environmental changes are slow (typically speaking) and happen over many many human generations.

to answer your question, if you can predict what the physical conditions on earth will be at your time of interest, we could start looking at the kind of changes that would be essential for survival there.

global warming, ozone layer depletion, higher levels of toxic chemicals in food and water,.. all these might be significant players in determining the future forms of all life on earth.

27

Re: Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

^All different living specie are dying out so I highly doubt if there will be any kind of life on earth in next few hundred years.

28

Re: Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

I don't think humans have evolved in anyway, we're simply good at one thing and that is adapting to our environment. This includes, as some of you mentioned your dental records or I what I shold say is "teeths". Teeths didn't evolve, what evolved was how to keep them in better shape, healthy, white, etc... Same thing applies to the human brain. Brains didn't evolve, if anything we had great scientists like Einstein and many others who were above average back in the days but what evolved here was common knowledge in a full package which has lead us to this current state.

We human beings adapted to computers some 20-30 years ago, to say that this is evolution and it evolved doesn't make sense here because we adapted to our environment. Same thing applies to cars, airplanes, etc. For one to say that this was evolved makes NO SENSE at all. Why aren't some of you thinking out of the box here?

It's the process of learning and getting better at it. In my eyes, humans have always been the same (ever seen discovery channel with human bones being found along with skeletons that look as good as new hundreds and thousands of years ago?)

Timepass- December 2012
29

Re: Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

.

30

^Keep thinking it will have good result!! :slight_smile:

I see your point.

But its not like they took frog bone, fishbone and thought it was human bone. If there were differences then those differences must have been thought to have disappeared. Its only a theory anyway.

We see on daily basis that human body adapts to needs.

A paraplegic man loses muscle mass in legs and on the other hand he develops big muscles on upper body with pushing his wheelchair.

Same way, heart develops more muscles with weight lifting or high blood pressure.

A person who uses brain more often to solve puzzles, mathematical questions or even tries to memorize number plates develops sharper memory. More neuron connections are built in brain.

31

sarkar…I was answering one aspect of your question. or did you forget your own question? let me bold and underline it so

[quote=“Mirch, post:12, topic:195550”]

If we the human are constantly evolving , what would we become in future ? WE will grow wings and would be able to fly ? We would be able to change our color like chameleon. **Have we stopped to evolve now ? If yes then why ? Is there any proof that we the humans are still evolving ?

and I gave you one proof, talk to your dentist, read on dental research, ..what ppl call ‘change’ is the same as adaptation and evolution..There are other things as well, from height to lifespan and everything in between. another example..do take a look at basketball players of 10-20-50 years ago and now..what happened, why is it happening..could it be classified as evolution..your call.

now what humans will change or evolve into, who knows, there can be impact of all kinds of climactic factors, diet etc that we dont know the long term impact of.

again this evolution does not happen in decades or even centuries but milleniums, multiple milleniums.

32

tallk to your dentist about what has been happening to wisdom teeth over last couple of centuries, and you will find out its not just about keepign them white :)

what you call adaptation, someoen can call evolution.

and as far as skeletons that scientists find, are you sure you have read all about the skeletons that have been found?

i mean homo erectus does not mean an aroused gay man...

33

LOL - Very funny. You have good sense of humor

But brother, jokes apart, Darwin's theory is just a THEORY without facts Darwin himself wasn't sure what the heck he was talking about. His theory is rejected by most, and not just by Muslims.

Another factror in this discussion is that as a Muslim, I believe in Quran and Allah Taalah says in Quran that he created this universe himself.

Quran talks about minor things related to humans and everything else, you think Allah would miss discussing homo ergaster or homo erectus or the big bang itself ?

Darwin's Theory rejects CREATIONISM which means, rejecting the creator, the all mighty Allah and there is word for people who do that....'KAFFIR'

and ALLAH knows best...

Timepass- December 2012
34

There is no mention of dinosaurs. Did they not exist too? So these bones they find are just demons and dragons?

35

Re: Can Darwin’s supporters answer this ?

Human race will ‘split into two different species’ | Mail Online
BBC NEWS | UK | Human species ‘may split in two’

:halo: i read this long back and got really scared.i dont want to be an ancestor of sush scary beings

36

Re: Can Darwin’s supporters answer this ?

all this stuff bout ppl changing because they do or dont do sumthing. like future ppl will have long arms, short necks bla bla jst because they use or dont use those parts.

doent all this seem more like lamark’s theory? rather than darwin’s:hmmm: :hmmm: survival of the fittest one :hmmm:

37

:bummer: really scary .

38

creationism can easily coexist with evolution. it does not have to be one or the other.
as far as quran talking about minor things, sure but does it talk about everything, did quran mention dinosaurs? or the skeletons of previous species. the aforementioned homoerectus or homohabilis, neandrathal, etc etc

no one is sayong god did not create the universe, but I dont think it is for you or I to limit what god can and can not do or how he can go about creating the universe.

as far as rejection of darwin's theory, sure..many reject it. but something being rejected by many does not make it a fact. theory of evolution is a theory, just like theory of everything being created from scratch in its current form is also a theory that leaves many unanswered questions and has no answer for simple things like environmental mutations

Allah does know best, and nothing in the Quran is explicitly against any sort of evolution.

KaL RaaT MaInE aPnE DiL sE TerA RiShTaa PocHaa
39

Re: Can Darwin’s supporters answer this ?

brilliant.

Reality Shows...why do you watch them?
40

Re: Can Darwin's supporters answer this ?

What is brilliant ?