Can Ahmadis & non-Ahmadis please answer

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Degas:
** .. ok am not following him! so what that means..
[/qoute]

The meaning is obvious....

[qoute]
He also said this..

"I am that same prophet , the very Incarnation of the "Seal of Prophets" and twenty years back in the Book Baraheen-i-Ahmadiah, I was called by God by the names of Muhammad and Ahmad and was declared by God Himself to be the very prophet in fresh and blood."
(Eik Ghalati-ka-Izala, Mirza Ghulam Qadiani)

[/qoute]

Well the word here is not incarnation but reflection ('zil' in arabic) and we know that although the reflection is same as actual but is nothing in itself, it existance is only due to the actual. This is what Mirza Sahib has said here. So there is nothing wrong in it. All of us have this goal i.e. to follow the footsteps of the Holy Prophet pbuh in such a way that we become exactly like him. This is what every muslim tries to do. Because he is the role model for us. But we can never reach the status he had, we could only become his reflection as all we would be at that stage would be because of him.

[qoute]
"It is a fact that Muhammad(pbuh) worked only three thousand miracles... My Miracles exceed one million in numbers."
(Ijaze-e-Ahmadi, Page 79; Tadhkira tul Shahadatain, Page 41)
[/qoute]

Whats your point here????? If u have any objection on the comparison of miracles then its baseless. Number of miracles is not a concern while comparing prophets. Its the strenght and greatness of miracles that matters. And we all know that a single miracle of Hazrat Mohammed PBUH i.e. Quran, superseeds all the miracles by all the prophets. So its no good trying to deduce from this extract that Mirza Sahib is naoozbillah comparing himself with the Holy Prophet. Dont put words in others mouth.

[qoute]

"It is possible for a man to attain a spiritual position higher than any other man; if any man wishes, he can rise even above Muhammad(pbuh)."
(Daily Al-Fadl, Jul 17. 1992, Mirza Basheer al-Din Mahmud Qadiani)
[/qoute]

Well, as bismah has rightly said, you must have the actual references before you while you make any objections. All you have done here is that u have given an inncomplete extract here. What follows this statement is that although the possibility for a man to attain a spiritual position higher than any other man and even above Muhammad(pbuh) is there but no mother has given birth to person who could do that and none will do so in the future.
So u see you have entirely changed the meanings of his speech by hiding a part of it as what is being said in actual is 180 degrees opposite to what u r trying to deduce.

[qoute]

"As for him (Muhammad), the moon was eclipsed but for me, two bright moons have eclipsed (solar eclipse). How dare you deny it? If his Kalam (words) were a miracle, a sign, my Kalam is also a miracle."
(Ijaze-e-Ahmadi, Page 79)

[/qoute]

Same a the one on miracles above.

[This message has been edited by sadeyes_neverlie (edited August 05, 2002).]

Are you sure he did not convert to Hinduism in Kashmir?

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/biggrin.gif

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/biggrin.gif

[quote]
Originally posted by Degas:
** .. and I stated above I had confusion bout those quotes and asked Qadianis here for their verification which never came!! though about his clain to be above Jesus - I had read myself..**
[/quote]

Sorry buddy, all I read is comic books, im no help.. Rely on Ahmedjee and Bismah.

No Nagarjuna, he didnt. Prophets never change their religion. They preach their own and stick to it themselves.

For those who are interested there is a site called http://tombofjesus.com/ which presents a very comprehensive study on the subject of Jesus in Kashmir. Its an impartail site and presents the viewpoint of all the sect, religions and personalities related to it. Please visit if you really have a thirst of knowledge.

[quote]
Originally posted by sadeyes_neverlie:
** No Nagarjuna, he didnt. Prophets never change their religion. They preach their own and stick to it themselves.**
[/quote]

.. so after 34 years of life in Bethlem ur saying he spent 86 years in Kashmir! We know graet Prophet Christ has a graet following and almost all his followers know him from his life in Bethlem..so how many people he converted in Kashmir to Christians in those 86 years ur saying he was in the beautuful valley of Kashmir. And u also say some Noor sahib went there and found his tomb..

[quote]
Originally posted by Degas:
** .. so after 34 years of life in Bethlem ur saying he spent 86 years in Kashmir! We know graet Prophet Christ has a graet following and almost all his followers know him from his life in Bethlem..so how many people he converted in Kashmir to Christians in those 86 years ur saying he was in the beautuful valley of Kashmir. And u also say some Noor sahib went there and found his tomb..

**
[/quote]

First of all i would like to ask where did u get to know that Jesus lived of 86 years in Kashmir?

As regards the number of followers, no one can tell as there was no system of censes at that time. I should also make it clear that the christanity today is not what Jesus really preached. Its distorted. So what Jesus might have preached in Kashmir or Afghanistan would be the concept of "Toheed" and other teachings relating to morals.

Very interesting site bro… Thanks

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

DONT MENTION!!!

[quote]
Originally posted by sadeyes_neverlie:
**

[quote]
Originally posted by sadeyes_neverlie:
** First of all i would like to ask where did u get to know that Jesus lived of 86 years in Kashmir?

As regards the number of followers, no one can tell as there was no system of censes at that time. I should also make it clear that the christanity today is not what Jesus really preached. Its distorted. So what Jesus might have preached in Kashmir or Afghanistan would be the concept of "Toheed" and other teachings relating to morals. **
[/quote]

.. I have heard from some qadianis that Jesus lived in Kashmir for 86 years and died at age of 120! if u have different figure it wont make a differece..

So when Jesus was in the beautiful valley of Kashmire and people in palestian had starting claiming Him to be a God or son of God why didnt he came back and refute it rather living obscurely in far away place.. I think Mirza Sahib work should be posted in joke section..

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Degas: *
*

.. I have heard from some qadianis that Jesus lived in Kashmir for 86 years and died at age of 120! if u have different figure it wont make a differece..

So when Jesus was in the beautiful valley of Kashmire and people in palestian had starting claiming Him to be a God or son of God why didnt he came back and refute it rather living obscurely in far away place.. I think Mirza Sahib work should be posted in joke section..
**
[/QUOTE]

I think you should be the one posted in joke section...
The reason he did not return to Palestine was because
he did not have intenet access, o did not know what was happening there.

.. really ! one of the most beloved messengers of God, Jesus didnt knew.. he had revelation and direct contact with God as we know from Bible.. Mirza Sahib have said his darja is even greater than Jesus :hehe: .. at least no one besides jews object to the truth of Jesus.. check his status from Quran.. musims love Jesus and our iman is not complete until we believe in Jesus..and what bout Mirza !

Jesus could with the power of Allah, bring the dead back to life, heal the blind, cure the lepers and predict the advent of Mohammad SAW.

But could not ascertain that he was being leveled as a partner with Allah. Which is THE sin of all sins - SHIRK. Unforgivable by Allah.

So you actually believe that Allah thought, OK - you're being classed as an equal to me by your people, but thats cool, I ain't got a problem with that, so I ain't gonna mention it you or do anything about it!!!

As Degas rightly said ' if this isn't a Joke, then what is'!!!!

You guys need to pull your heads out of your a$$.. NONE of your arguments in anywhay dipute the possibility that Jesus could have come to Kashmir...
Just because he did not return to Palestine does not mean he had never left Palestine for Kashmir.
Perhaps he gave up on those jews, and realised that they were as lost the jews were before he came... He probably left their fate to god. He also knew that if he were to go back , he would grab to much attention and be in the same situation he was prior to leavung Palestine. This is Sorta the way Moses destroyed the ten commandments when he relized the Jews had commited blasphemy.
The only joke is you people... You obviously have no respect for anyone, which is complete contrary to Iislamic beliefs which you jokers claim to espouse. Your a bunch of hypocrits... Thats the state the Muslim world is in today.

Adnan Ahmed

Many thanks for your eloquent reply!!!

Like the old saying goes, 'like leader, like follower'!!

I'm sure you know what I mean?

Unfortunately we are not contortionists, therefore cannot take up your request regarding our heads. Maybe you can show us!

Ever consider sticking to reality and not fantasy!!!

Keep representing.

This is my first post in the new version of GS!

Anyway, we have had a lot of replies, but I am still confused as to why the Ahmadies hold this belief. I thought that Mr Mirza may have been a decendant of a Kashmiri who claimed to be one the the decendants of the claimed Messiha, so as to add some form of credability to his claim to nabowat. This is not the case.

From what I have learned from the more serious replies, it seems that an arhcheologist/historian asked by Mirza to do some research came to that conlcusion. Consequently, it is an article of faith for all ahmadis to accept this hypothesis.

A strange conept and belief, but I suppose each to thier own.

YOU SHOULD WATCH WHAT YOU SAY… YOU DONT WANT TO BURN IN HELL FIRE FOR ALL ETERNITY DO YOU?
I blame ignorance of your kind on upbringing…
Well, as they say, like father like son.. Im sure you know what I mean.
Why should I draw you a picture of your head, you know where it is…
You a typical ignorant jahil.
AN idiot…:k:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Alpha1: *
This is my first post in the new version of GS!

Anyway, we have had a lot of replies, but I am still confused as to why the Ahmadies hold this belief. I thought that Mr Mirza may have been a decendant of a Kashmiri who claimed to be one the the decendants of the claimed Messiha, so as to add some form of credability to his claim to nabowat. This is not the case.

From what I have learned from the more serious replies, it seems that an arhcheologist/historian asked by Mirza to do some research came to that conlcusion. Consequently, it is an article of faith for all ahmadis to accept this hypothesis.

A strange conept and belief, but I suppose each to thier own.
[/QUOTE]

You call that strange.. A Christian may accuse you of the same, how could anyone survive the cross? Strannge that anyone could ever live to tell about something like that, and yet Muslims claim he did survive.
Still Jjesus in Kashmir is not a strange belief at all, in fact its very likely... You only choose ignore even the possibility because you are so strongly bias towards Ahmedis...Its typical of your type.

Adnan Ahmed

Ooooooh, family insults. What a refreshing change from an Ahmedy.

'If the going gets tough, result to personal insults'!

I wonder where have I seen this scenario before.

Oh yes. Debates with Ahmedies!( Article of Faith)

Well done for confirming your intellect and the stereotypes.

Compared to you, I'm a Scholar my friend.

Please refrain from insulting yourself even further, by calling your peers, role models, and superiors idiots. What is this world coming to? Kids these days have no manners!!!!

I suggest you contact the Vatican and ask them why they've been slow on the uptake of controling the monopoly of Jesus's grave? Duh!!

An old pakistani saying describing the likes of you 'shukl bhairy, zubaan bhairy', 'akl kum, dhungar hum'.

See Ya, Cuz I Wouldn't Wanna be Ya!!