Brazil Won't Send Troops to Help in Iraq

**Brazil Won’t Send Troops to Help in Iraq **
Fri Sep 19,10:16 AM ET

BRASILIA, Brazil - Brazil has rejected a U.S. request to send peacekeeping troops to Iraq (news - web sites) because of the “difficult” security situation there, Defense Minister Jose Viegas said.

Thursday’s announcement came days before President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva was to meet President Bush (news - web sites) in Washington. Brazil opposed the war in Iraq.

“The request was rejected in view of the difficulties facing the U.S. and British army since the regime of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was toppled,” Viegas said.

“Brazilian (news - web sites) citizens understand our reasons to avoid exposure of (Brazilian) troops in Iraq as the situation there continues being difficult, with soldiers injured or killed almost daily.”

who is next? :slight_smile:

Pakistan is next. They will send the troops. A $3B package of refinanced loans was approved by the house. All the help hat monay can buy. :)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Matsui: *
Pakistan is next. They will send the troops. A $3B package of refinanced loans was approved by the house. All the help hat monay can buy. :)
[/QUOTE]

yeah maybe under UN mandate only. other than that i see no reason pakistan sending its troops to iraq. who will be wrong, only time will tell :)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by BabyGulabJaman: *

other than that i see no reason pakistan sending its troops to iraq.
[/QUOTE]

$ :) $

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *

$ :) $
[/QUOTE]

like i said only time will tell. so far your $ have not saved your so-called-soldiers in iraq and afghanistan. :)

I don't think the US can afford the Pak army they'd snap up that 87 billion and spend it on booze alone.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by BabyGulabJaman: *

like i said only time will tell. so far your $ have not saved your so-called-soldiers in iraq and afghanistan. :)
[/QUOTE]

Musharraf and Bush are set to meet the first week of October.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by BabyGulabJaman: *

like i said only time will tell. so far your $ have not saved your so-called-soldiers in iraq and afghanistan. :)
[/QUOTE]
Really? Care to share with us the conflict, invasion, defeat and occupation of two countries with fewer causulties?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by BabyGulabJaman: *
see no reason pakistan sending its troops to iraq.

[/QUOTE]

mushy wants to remain alive :D.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Seminole: *
Really? Care to share with us the conflict, invasion, defeat and occupation of two countries with fewer causulties?
[/QUOTE]

fewer causulties on which side? your or their? surely your not saying that 20,000+ afghanis and 8,000+ iraqis killed by USA and co are fewer causulties. if so then IMHO 911 is not even worth-mentioning compared to these fewer causulties. but you'll consider it HUGE because it had hit you at home. :)