Re: Benazir-Musharraf deal: National Reconciliation Ordinance ready
Brother, I hope that Supreme Court declares that NRO is illegal ordinance and cannot be implemented, be that in its essences or sprite as:
‘NRO’ goes against the basic principle of justice as well as human rights of equality.
‘NRO’ goes against Islamic principle where justice should be same for all (whereas if corrupts are forgiven than Pakistani Nation full of poor and down trodden people whose wealth, future and prosperity these people have looted and plundered would not get justice).
‘NRO’ humiliates courts as it says that corrupts and thugs are getting ‘blanket pardon’ because court could not do their job and conclude their cases even after many years.
‘NRO’ slaps on the intelligence of Pakistani Nation and tells that Pakistanis as a Nation is such deteriorated people without any fight back in them that corrupt and thug Politicians and bureaucrats can loot and plunder them, and than from one ordinance get pardon of all their past sins and injustices to Pakistan and people of Pakistan.
‘NRO’ is one of the dark ordinance that any country has ever seen, where corrupts and thugs got blanket forgiveness and rights to take them to court on corruption and nepotism got dropped without court verdict.
It is no excuse that a case has taken so long to conclude that case should get dropped. Most of Pakistani cases do take years anyhow (due to inefficiency and corruption that exists in Pakistan Judiciary system). As for cases against corrupts, apart of inefficiency and corruption in Pakistan Judiciary system, most of them are taking long because corrupts keep trying to get the hearing delayed and some even left the country on various fabricated reasons, so that cases cannot be heard.
Supreme Court should tell Benazir that if she thinks that she is not corrupt than she should first sue American senate where she was discusses as corrupt, she should sue various British newspaper where she was labelled as corrupt. Same goes for Nawaz Shareef that before expecting anything from Pakistan, he should sue British Newspaper where he was labelled as corrupt.
Than after that she should come to Pakistani courts and clear herself from all corruption charges. Chief justice should set up a new bench so that bench should look at all corruption charges and conclude that on merit as soon as possible, so that no one gets excuse that Pakistani courts cannot conclude corruption cases.
Here are few of BB and Zardari cases from western sources:
If Benazir was not corrupt, is it possible that American Senate would have discussed her corruption so that they can change their banking law? If Benazir and Zardari are not corrupt, she should first sue American senate for their discussion about her (and her husband) corruptions and labelling her (and her husband) as corrupt. Read her case discussed in American senate on American senate site. She (along with her husband) is discussed in this long report to Senate (2nd case history: Zardari case) in some details, that comes somewhere in middle of Senate report: (2) Asif Ali Zardari Case History
U.S. Senate: 404 Error Page](U.S. Senate: 404 Error Page)
Regarding involvement of Zardari in drugs
If Zardari is not involved in such cases, than he should sue Sunday Times (UK) before bragging to Pakistan public that he is not corrupt smuggler.
Abstract from ‘The Sunday Time (UK)’ 23 February 1997: Pakistan: Drug sting on Bhutto’s husband
The husband of Benazir Bhutto, deposed prime minister of Pakistan was targeted in an undercover drug sting by American government investigators working alongside a British Scotland Yard informant. Pretending to represent the American mafia, John Banks claimed to have secretly recorded five hours of conversations with her husband, Asif Ali Zardari, discussing how drugs were going to be shipped. Banks claims the investigation was halted when the CIA said it did not wish to destabilise Pakistan. [Sunday Times (UK) 23 February 1997]
Further from: The Sunday Times 12-04-1998 regarding BB and Zardari corruptions:
http://www.mqm.com/bb-booty-times-1998-04-12.htm](http://www.mqm.com/bb-booty-times-1998-04-12.htm)
If Benazir and Zardari are not corrupts, than they should first sue ‘The Sunday Times (UK)’ on story about their (BB and Zardair) corruptions (as well as American Senate). Actually there are hundreds of such reports available in western press for them to sue and clear their name.
Here is one of many NS cases that came in British newspapers:
Guardian (UK) 24 October 1999 analysis and accusations on Nawaz Shareef corruptions, atrocities, plus freedom of press:
Search for the millions Sharif 'stole' | World news | The Guardian](Search for the millions Sharif 'stole' | World news | The Guardian)
One should remember that British newspaper (like ‘The Sunday Times’) like Pakistani newspapers could not publish rubbish and fabricated stories about someone without proof (where they believe they can defend themselves in court), as they can be sued whoever they accuse without proof for heavy compensation.
If Supreme Court (and CJ) struck this ordinance as illegal and stops it to get implemented (as they should do) than I would consider this as a major gift of Supreme court and Chief Justice to Pakistan, something as compensation to whatever wrong they may have done in past.
Pakistan** kiya mulk hay kay her sue hay ghalazat ka karkhana**
Ho jahan umeed woheen say nikatla hay NRO ka khabarnama
Houti hay yahaan loot maar aur ghareebon ka banta hay nishana
Loottay hain hakim yahaan aur phir hota hay reconciliation ka drama
I predicted before the NRO was even promulgated that the CJ would strike it down, in line with Musharraf’s grand plan to dupe BB.