Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

American concerns: US Congressional hearing on Balochistan today**The US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs is set to convene a congressional hearing on Wednesday (February 8), for an exclusive discussion for the first-time ever on Balochistan.

**

The event which will be closely monitored by Islamabad will be chaired by Republican Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, who recently co-authored an article with Congressman Louie Gohmert expressing support for an independent Balochistan.

Interestingly, the testimony of Georgetown assistant professor C Christine Fair, who is a member of the three-member panel of witnesses, was uploaded on the internet on Tuesday. In her testimony, Fair has highlighted the government of Pakistan’s ‘extractive policies’ over the decades to keep an ‘ironclad control over the state’.

The professor has gone on to emphasise the ongoing human rights violations in Balochistan and the government’s decision to ‘pursue military action, involving the forced disappearances of youths with no criminal records and the elimination of Baloch tribal leaders’. In her testimony, Fair will also seek to poke holes in the Pakistani state’s argument that military and paramilitary action is justified because Baloch tribal leaders are irreconcilable to the state with research that found that any conciliatory move by government led to a decline in militant attacks.

Fair, who will present a number of recommendations, will not ‘entertain’ any proposal for an independent Balochistan, saying that ‘given the ethnic diversity of the province, its complicated history, and the existing geographic constraints, an independent Balochistan is untenable’.

However, the professor has mentioned the implementation of certain government programmes such as the Aghaz-e-Haqooq-e-Balochistan to help the province within the constitutional framework of Pakistan, adding that ‘the US with its partners can use select instruments of its national powers to encourage Pakistan to do the right thing’.

The two other members of the panel include defence analyst Ralph Peters and Pakistan Director of the Human Rights Watch Ali Dayan Hasan.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

FO takes exception to US Congress hearing on Balochistan

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Setting the stage for Humanitarian and Protection of Civilian intervention like Libya, Yemen and Syria. Well done USA.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

I wonder what's happened to nawaz sharif all parties conference on balochistan!

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Congressional Hearing Brings Baloch Diaspora to DC

It is not important how unfair C. Christine Fair is with the Baloch. There is a lot more to add to Wednesday’s Congressional hearing on Balochistan. The event has at least provided the Balochs of United States and Canada to get together. I have known many Baloch politicians, writers and professors but I had never met them before. Now, they are all telling me that they are coming to DC to attend the much-hyped meeting. I jokingly told the Canadian Baloch delegation, which is arriving in DC tomorrow, that the atmosphere was reminiscent of the BSO’s council session in Quetta. Whenever the BSO organizes its annual session, student activists travel from all parts of Balochistan to attend.

The hearing is also getting a lot of attention from the supporters and friends of Balochistan from other communities such as the Sindhis, Tamils and Kurds. Of course the Indian and Pakistani embassies in Washington DC are also going to closely monitor the hearing.

You may ask what is the big deal about the hearing. Well, it is a big deal.Even the assemblies and standing committees in other three Pakistani provinces do not discuss Balochistan and it is an important occasion for the Balochs that they issue is being debated in a powerful US congressional committee.I am not sure how many Pakistani television channels and newspaper will run the story about the hearing, but the entire press corps of the Pakistani American journalists is also showing up. So for, I have asked several friends if they are coming and they tell me, “of course I am, what do you mean?

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Lets see what comes out from the meeting, out of the three people to put forward their views, the Baloch are not happy with the statements of Christine Fair, and Ali Dayan (Human Rights watch) lets see what Ralp Peter would have said and what the committee decides and how they can coerce to stop the violence in Balochistan.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Video about the congressional meet (I havent myself watched it yet)

[video]http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid806981722001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAukPArhE~,qbf0tVPj CtnNNW1HBWpv8ScJhOlAGRok&bctid=1427964819001[/video]

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

I wonder if the congress every conducted hearings into kashmir and now nagaland?

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Kashmir was about India, and balochistan is Pakistan (American ally), faraq saaf zaahir hay!!!

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

US congress committee discusses Balochistan

WASHINGTON: The United States (US) Congress Committee on Foreign Affairs is discussing situation of Balochistan.

Seven experts on Pakistan have been invited to brief the meeting which is underway.

A Republican Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, who recently co-authored an article with Congressman Louie Gohmert has expressed concern over Balochistan saying that it is an insurgency hit area.** He said that this province has vital strategic importance.****

He further said that human rights violation is also there in Balochistan.**

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Human rights abuses: US committee hears grievances of Balochistan****WASHINGTON: **In the packed Room 2200 of the Rayburn Office Building, members of the House Foreign Affairs’ Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations began hearing human rights activists and scholars detail human rights abuses in Balochistan.

**
The hearing chaired by Congressman (R) Dana Rohrabacher, who last week introduced a bill in the House of Representatives to award Dr. Shakil Afridi with US citizenship. In his opening remarks, Rep. Rohrabacher said that Balochistan is a turbulent land marred by human rights violations “by regimes that are against US values”.

**Rep. Rohrabacher outlined the history of Pakistan’s creation, and highlighted Balochistan’s grievances vis a vis natural resources, said that the province’s wealth was being taken by dominant Punjabi elite.

**
**Addressing the committee, scholar Christine Fair said that while she understood emotions ran high, targeted killings were also being carried out by the Baloch.

**
**In his submitted testimony to the committee, Amnesty International’s Advocacy Director T. Kumar called on the US to “apply the Leahy Amendment without waivers to all Pakistani military units in Balochistan.”

**
**Ali Dayan Hasan, the Pakistan director for Human Rights Watch, in his submitted remarks, said that cases documented by the HRW show that Pakistan’s security forces and its intelligence agencies were involved in the enforced disappearance of ethnic Baloch. The HRW representative asked the US government in his recommendations to “communicate directly to the agencies responsible for disappearances and other abuses including the army, ISI, IB, Frontier Corps, police and other law enforcement and intelligence agencies, to demand an end to abuses and facilitate criminal inquiries to hold perpetrators accountable.”

**
Hasan dubbed the military’s role in the province as brutal, and an occupying one. He clarified that the HRW took no position on the issue of the independence of Balochistan. He argued that the US and UK had made enforced disappearances possible by allowing them during the war on terror, which has led to the military doing the same. Christine Fair added that Pakistan’s abuse of human rights have served the US’ interests.

In his testimony, analyst Ralph Peters called Pakistan a supporter of terrorism, and said that Pakistan had made the US complicit too by launching attacks against India such as the Mumbai attack.

The hearing, which lasted a little over an hour, came to an end as congressmen decided to go to the floor for a vote. In his closing remarks, Rep. Rohrabacher declared that the hearing was no stunt, and that they wanted to start a national dialogue on what US policy should be in that part of the world.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

I heard how Ralph Peters referred to 2012 as "year of the lord 2012" and it makes a lot of sense why that middle eastern map came into being that was published in 2006. Also, I am pretty sure that balochis, though a significant group are not the majority of balochistan. Pashtuns are about as much as balochis and if we add sindhis, urdu-speakers, and punjabis, then balochis are a minority in the province. Some say it is because of afghan refugees that pashtun numbers tipped off the balance in their favor, but lets face it that those refugees aren't going back. Pashtuns and balochis have tribal animosities, which is why you see people like mehmood achakzai conspicuously absent from all of this.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

What's happening now in Washington was my biggest concern, that was the reason for me trumpeting this issue during the past few months. Balochistan has a very vital strategic location and with the ties of Pakistan and Americans cooling down, we might see active interest of the Americans in the issue to keep Pakistan under pressure. Pakistan needs to sort this problem on urgent basis now as time is running out very quickly.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

It would be a big mess as unlike Bangladesh, balochistan is not on another side of the world and I don't think Pakistanis (the army) would take it kindly to lose such a big portion of Pakistan. Iran doesn't want the independence bug in its sistan province either, so you would see a convergence of interests between Iran and Pakistan. The congress is free to brain fart all it wants but lets see what the US establishment really wants viz balochistan.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Every single thing on the face of earth is a matter of conern for the US. While Balochistan is an "insurgency-hit" province for Christine Fair, Kashmir remains a piece of paradise for the global policeman. Though this is a gross US interference into Pakistan's internal affairs, yet I know it would be treated as routinly and casually by Islamabad as anything and everything else.

I am not sure what others may suggest, but I feel that Pakistan should immediately call back its envoy from Washington in protest against Congress becoming a palyground of paid lobbyists and hearing something that it has no right and juristidction whatsoever. A proactive reaction must ensue the development or it will continue to echo in the US more and more loudly.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

appoint someone else for the kashmir propaganda cell in america organised and funded by ISI , allocate more money so that ISI agent responsible for kasmir hue and cry mission,he should be able to pay the american taxes , your last ISI jasoos was arrested and jailed for money laundering and theft of tax . even in side kashmir ISI has failed in all covert terror missions , in the last elections 60 percent people took part despite best efforts of pakistan based jehadis to cause the mischief .

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Pakistan army ko izzat raas Nahin Aati, they spoil everything. The issue that they could have solved many months ago easily and on upper hand now they will solve it under pressure with militants on upper hand.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Moral victory for the Baloch, while the other three provincial provinces and federal government couldnt find it important to show solidarity with Balochistan, their voice is now being heard by the masters of Pakistan army.
http://www.dawn.com/2012/02/09/rights-violations-shame-pakistanis-at-congress-hearing.html

Rights violations shame Pakistanis at Congress hearing

WASHINGTON: Guilt and shame were the two dominant feelings that overwhelmed many Pakistanis at a US congressional hearing room on Wednesday as witnesses detailed human rights abuses in Balochistan. Some were also troubled – while some felt elated – as all five US lawmakers who attended this unusual hearing of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations stressed the Baloch right to self-determination.
But this emotive session](http://www.dawn.com/2012/02/06/us-congressional-hearing-may-spell-trouble-for-pakistan.html) – which often drew warm applause from Baloch nationalists – offered little insight into how to resolve this difficult issue. Perhaps, that’s not even the intention of those who had organised the meeting. They wanted to highlight Balochistan as a possibly explosive spot close to a US war-theatre and they succeeded in doing so.

There was some score-settling as well, particularly from US lawmakers upset with Pakistan over Osama bin Laden’s discovery in Abbottabad and with Islamabad’s decision to close Nato’s supply lines to Afghanistan.

“They sheltered the man who master-minded the slaughter of 3,000 Americans. Those who still believe Pakistan is a friend, they need to wake up,” said Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican, who organised and chaired the hearing.

Dr. M. Hosseinbor, a Baloch nationalist scholar, assured the Americans that the Balochs were natural US allies and would like to share the Gwadar port with the United States, would not allow the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline through their lands and will fight the Taliban as well.

**Ralph Peters, a retired US military officer, urged the US administration to break up its ties with Pakistan and support the Baloch struggle for freedom.
**
**C. Christine Fair, an assistant Professor at Georgetown University, in her written statement, disagreed with the suggestion, saying that given the ethnic diversity of the province, its complicated history, and the existing geographic constraints, an independent Balochistan was untenable.
**
**But such comments on Baloch politics were not what shamed the Pakistanis, and others, in the room. It was rampant human rights violations by both sides that shamed them.
**
**According to the statistics submitted at the hearing, around 6,000 people were displaced and scores killed in 2005 around Dera Bugti district alone.
**
**Estimates of total number of people displaced from all districts range from tens to hundreds of thousands.
**
**After Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s ouster, Pakistan’s Interior Ministry estimated that 1,100 Baloch had disappeared during his rule. So far, the government has only uncovered the fate of a handful of these people.
**
Armed Baloch groups are also responsible for targeted killings and destroying private property. In the past several years, they have increasingly targeted non-Baloch civilians and their businesses, as well as major gas installations and infrastructure. They have also killed teachers, physicians and lawyers and struck police and security forces and military bases throughout the province.

Militant religious groups also have carried out targeted killings of those Muslims who belong to sects different from there.

It was Prof. Fair, who was the first to point out, that while she understood emotions ran high, targeted killings were also being carried out by the Baloch.

**Amnesty International’s Advocacy Director T. Kumar called on the US to “apply the Leahy Amendment without waivers to all Pakistani military units in Balochistan” to prevent the Pakistani military from using US-made weapons against the Baloch.
**
**Ali Dayan Hasan, the Pakistan director for Human Rights Watch, said that Pakistan’s security forces and its intelligence agencies were involved in the enforced disappearance of Baloch nationalists.
**
**He asked the US government to “communicate directly to the agencies responsible for disappearances and other abuses including the army, ISI, IB, Frontier Corps, police, to demand an end to abuses and facilitate criminal inquiries to hold perpetrators accountable.”
**
Congressman Rohrabacher declared that the hearing was no stunt, and that they wanted to start a national dialogue on what US policy should be in that part of the world.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

finally…http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2012\02\09\story_9-2-2012_pg7_1#.TzNigsmE6MA.twitter

Tempers high in NA, Senate over Balochistan issue
** Senators walk out, say establishment responsible for killing of Domki’s family

By Ijaz Kakakhel and Tanveer Ahmed*

ISLAMABAD: **Temperatures rose to boiling point in parliament on Wednesday when the issues of rights violation and forced disappearances in Balochistan were discussed in both the upper and the lower houses, with senators walking out and the government admitting the precarious situation in the province.

The Upper House observed a heated debate, where all sans PPP senators walked out of the session over the deteriorating situation in Balochistan, claiming that an East-Pakistan-like situation had been created in the province. The debate began when Jamhuri Wattan Party (JWP) Senator Shahid Hassan Bugti, on a point of order, raised the issue of the killings of MPA Mir Bakhtiyar Domki’s wife and daughter in Karachi. He said some elements as well as the government wanted to twist the incident, and had termed it a matter of personal enmity.

“More brutalities have been carried out on Balochistan’s people in the current democratic set-up than in the tenure of dictator Pervez Musharraf. In the Baloch/Pashtoon culture, no one kills women or children, even if it is a personal enmity… We don’t trust the federal government and demand a probe into the incident, as it happened in Sindh,” Bugti added. Some senators said that instead of getting their sense of deprivation removed, the people of Balochistan were receiving decomposed bodies of their relatives.** JI Senator Prof Khurshid said Balochistan was burning and the civilian government had totally failed to address the issue, adding that the establishment was responsible for it. ANP Senator Zahid Khan said, “We are repeating the East-Pakistan-like situation, and all government agencies and departments should be tasked over Domki family’s killing.”

Opposition leader Abdul Ghafoor Haidri and other senators, including Haji Muhammad Adeel, Abdul Nabi Bangash, Mushahidullah Khan, SM Zafar and Rehana Yahya, also expressed similar views and urged the government to take action. **Over in the National Assembly, the government admitted that wide-ranging human rights violations had been taking place in Balochistan with the number of forced disappearances increasing. “Rights violations are taking place across the country. However, in Balochistan, this phenomenon has grown to forced disappearances, target killings, murder of settlers and sectarian violence,” Adviser to PM on Human Rights Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar told the House. To a question, he said that as per official figures, the number of forced disappearances had increased from 180 in 2010 to 206 in 2011. “Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have also taken notice of these violations,” Khokhar said.

He expressed his inability to prevent such violations, saying that the Ministry of Human Rights’ mandate “is just limited to identifying these violations, and has no power to take action against injustices”. MNA Humayun Aziz Kurd said the US had planned to axe Balochistan from Pakistan. He demanded explanation from Interior Minister Rehman Malik as to why the army was not interested in holding talks with terrorists. He also pointed out that some ministers had been contributing to the worsening situation in the province.**

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

s/06_04.gif