Babri Masjid - Archeological & Historical View

[the_kaur]

Re: Babri Masjid - Archeological & Historical View

@muqawwee123

Well said the kaur. We can understand that general public may be exploited by propaganda and playing with religious emotions, but Allahabad High Court decision on the matter and the behavior / comments of Hon’ble judges to form basis of their decision was also some what controversial which was criticised by historians like Ramila Thapar & others. http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010\10\02\story_2-10-2010_pg7_30

The issue will remain contentious till doomsday. it is about faith and faith runs over logic. Neither it matters to Allah nor to Bhagwan Ram, they both are great enough to pardon. Awadh was the richest land of India, it produced soldier of 1857 revolt, revolutionary capital kanpur is in Awadh. Ramdhaam da puri suhawani, lok samsti bidit ati paavni, dhaari khaani jag jeev apara, avadh tajen tanu nahi sansara. Now Ayodhya is one filthy place devoid of good amenities, what Awadh needs is good governance and better amenities. and case is in SC, so I will abide by that decision.

@UZ

Thanks for sharing Muqawee I have to read in detail about this issue, I have very strong emotions against those people who destroyed babri masjid.

Nehru envisioned a democratic, socialist, secular, democratic society that has highest tolerant, his views were so impractical that it cost us war with China for helping Dalai Lama, backwards were considered unequals among equals, there is no constitutional and legal discrimination in Nehru’s India. This was direct attack on that idea, My Bhagwan Ram would have never done this.

@muqawwee123

^ yes, we should express our resentment for those factors who are behind destruction of any of the religious / historical sites. Be it Babri Masjid or Bamiyan.

I have a question, I know mosque cannot be made on illegal obtained places,Saudis demolished many illegal one. supposing that Babar did destroy the temple, is it acceptable to Islam??