Re: Atheism
Peace jaanaan
The version of the Darwinian theory of evolution made popular in the mid-1900s suggested that apes are less advanced than us and we came from them, the explanation given to why the Apes did not evolve further was because they had become “fit” for their environment and did not require further speciation. In fact, even today the evolutionists still dip in to this idea/explanation.
Later the Neo-Darwinian theory came about because to explain that we did not evolve from apes but both modern apes and modern man evolved from something that predated both … This theory was more immune to the criticisms that the previous one had - some involving compatibility and others regarding racist elements.
In the past the evolution moved from black people to white people …
Modern theory conflicts with that to suggest Neanderthal and Homo Erectus heritage explains the advent of current human features across the globe … So it still accepts that earliest man came from Africa, but also suggests that Europeans have more Neanderthal lineage …
Common ancestry is unapproachable for criticism because not only are the ancestors “that may have existed” well and gone - but there are no specimens that represent the break away point of each descendant … we merely have some candidate that appears very far in the past the critical break away point has no sample specimens and then we have a sudden ending of the “ancestor” and a sudden appearance of the “two or more descendent” candidates.
You see I was explaining how evolution has changed through the years … The theory is evolving … and something only evolves if it is not fit for purpose … so if the theory is not fit for purpose then how can it be a fact?