Atheism

[yazdi]

Re: Atheism

@psyah

Peace yazdi

The Galileo comment I’m going to ignore it is meaningless in this discussion. However, I am not a religious literalist … (I think that is what you meant … Not literal religionist … Because that too is meaningless) … I am a follower of the Qur’an, Sunnah and Ijma of scholars.

Regarding the Qur’an, the terms it uses make perfect sense to people in each age … despite the concepts changing through time … To a layman when it speaks of the path taken by the sun, they take it to mean something that had it been written more restrictively it would have been cause to fault the Qur’an, however, since the** language used is both lucid enough to provide meaning, but at the same time general enough not to restrict how it is understood from common knowledge** … It makes the collective into a Book applicable in every age without fault.

What you have written above is nonsense.

How conveniently you change the understanding when you want to..

Zakir Naik types are the biggest hypocrites I have seen in my life who change the scripture, translation, understanding, meaning to suit their agendas.. and the explanation they give?

Oh the language is very lucid… and there is no restriction about how it is understood…!!!

Means you can derive whatever meaning you want to according to your own desire…

I respect Mududi and Dr. Israr for their honesty.. they have a clear stand that there is no science in Quran.. and it should not be taken in literal sense.. It’s a guidance and spiritual book which should be read and understood accordingly..