Re: Atheism
Fossil evidence has continually and repeatedly destroyed evolution, but instead of abandoning it, the evolutionists just kept modifying their theory.
First we came from apes, we were more advanced than apes, then we found fossils of less advanced creatures occurring later and more advanced creatures earlier, then they modified the theory … “oh no” they said, we don’t come from apes, “but apes and us come from the same ancestor”, … and apes are now just as advanced as us apparently, in terms of evolution … They are as evolved as us … In the past we used to have an aspect evolution that explained how or why creatures remained unevolved whilst others would evolve … They used the idea of niche … That being well suited to your own niche meant that you will remain as so … They apply this on to the long “unchanged” shark and crocodile … However to explain the common ancestor theory they need another idea … The idea of constant gradual change … Before it used to be survival of the fittest … This has not been abandoned, but to explain certain traits they ignore this principle … For example humans taking care of sick and elderly … Why do we do that?
The moral creature … Why only from the ape? Will a dolphin develop morality? Acting or behaving like another thing … Will a dog behave like a human?
Ask them about the biochemical pathways used in speciation … Our chromosomes are 46, the chimps are 48 … How many did our common ancestor have? What was the mechanism that led to the ancestral chromosome structure to become ours on one hand and the chimps on the other hand and why are the ancestral forms now extinct? These are very reasonable questions that people who understand evolution should be asking themselves … The ones who fail to ask such questions are the ones who don’t understand it.