It’s not about arrogance either - it is about science and how it is undertaken … if you follow through the argument about the difference between a science and a faith and you will see that evolution is a faith …
Try arguing from the point of view of absolutes like a scientist and compare the fundamentals of the subject itself - citing x, y and z people about “what they believe evolution is” is only proving my point - you cite them because you are unable to show evolution is not a belief and is a science on its own merit.
In my previous post - I expressed my lack of desire to continue such a conversation if everything I know about science is wrong … I was not the one being arrogant …