Ask a Christian

End of the World

Pardon for the delay in replying -- I wanted to look up some stuff; however entire books have been written on these topics. That said, first I'll answer on the end of the world: in the New Testament Jesus says, "But of that day and hour knoweth no man" (Mt 24:36), but that has not stopped people from thinking they figured out the date(for example Harold Camping in 2011, or Miller in 1844). However there are passages in the Bible(Mt 24, Mark 13, Luke 21, 2 Tim 3) which are seen as predicting what the last days will be like, and every generation has seen it as applicable to their time. One prediction is the last generation will be like the time of Noah and of Sodom.(Conservatives see this in Western culture's acceptance of what Islam calls "zina" and other things that I hear are taboo topics in some Muslim countries.) Another sign of the end is a great deception and a mass apostasy.(2 Tim 3:5 says people will have a form of godliness but deny the power thereof; conservatives see this liberal Christians who reinterpret "zina" [we don't use that term] to conform to mainstream Western secular society, also in the increasing secularization of the West as a whole, and in anything that weakens the idea of Jesus' being the only way to God[sometimes this is hostile to Islam]). The establishment of Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict is seen as a fulfillment of prophecy by many people. (This is where Christian Zionism comes from; since people of this school of thought seek political office and lobby for their position -- this contributes to much of USA's support for the Israeli settlements.) People of this school of thought often engage in "newspaper exegesis", reading fulfillment of prophecy in the news and thinking the Rapture will happen at any moment.
All this I listed above is part of the Dispensationalism I mentioned in the Antichrist post. Dispensationalism belongs to a theology called premillennialism, meaning that Jesus will return to earth before reigning a thousand years. The Jehovah's Witnesses have a different view of premillennialism, which doesn't involve Israel, the Rapture, or the Antichrist. They believe Jesus was crowned King in heaven and will soon come to earth.
Another view is Postmillennialism, which says the thousand years mentioned in Revelation 20 is symbolic of the time between Jesus' being on earth and returning. In one version(Dominionism) Christians get in charge of things, make governments Christian (I think in the theocratic sense), then Jesus will return. In another version Christians work to improve the world; at some point as this goes on Jesus returns.
The last view is Amillenialism, which says the Millennium is entirely symbolic and one day(we don't know when) Jesus will show up.

Now on sacrifice and atonement: there are a number of theories on the atonement; I'll start with penal substitution, since it's the one a street evangelist will likely use when preaching to you, and the one that raises the questions you asked. One explanation is God's law says, "The wages of sin is death." (Rom. 6:23). As Ray Comfort points out to people he talks to using the 10 Commandments, we have all done something wrong at least once, making us liable for death. One apologist used the analogy of a young woman who gets a speeding ticket. The judge has to sentence her to the fine(otherwise justice is compromised); but, being the girl's father, pays the fine himself. Thus, since Jesus never sinned, He agreed to take the punishment for humanity; thus God can take sin seriously but still forgive.
Another theory is Christus Victor, which says Jesus' death and resurrection are God's victory over sin, Satan, death, and other demonic powers. This theory focuses on the Resurrection and gives attention to Jesus' entire life. It views sin not so much as breaking the rules God set up, but as being out of alignment with how and who God created us to be. Thus God hates sin because He loves us and sin is destructive. (Thus, "the wages of sin is death" is not seen as a punishment handed down from God as a Judge, but as,like fire burning, the natural consequence of our actions.) Jesus' coming is seen as God's deciding to become human because He wants to restore His relationship with us.(This is why He made humans, for fellowship and friendship.) So when Jesus interacts with the outcasts, the poor, the lost, the hurting God was challenging and undermining the systems of oppression and exclusion. Jesus began His ministry with a quote from Isaiah 61: "The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD has anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; He hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound; to proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn." (verses 1-2). In the Christus Victor model, the cross is not considered necessary for forgiveness, but as something God used to defeat the powers of evil. In the words of Derek Flood, "To the one wracked with guilt God says through the cross, 'I'll take the blame. I'll pay the price.' To the one who is locked in self-hate God says through the cross 'I love you so much I would give My life defending you.' To the one in rebellion to life God says through the cross, 'See Me here. I am not a threat; I am love.' " (Penal Substitution vs Christus Victor by Derek Flood, p. 31) The bottom line is no matter where you've been, where you are, where you're hurting God meets you where you are because He cares. Right now we are in between "already" and "not yet", meaning we can believe in love in a loveless world, we can hope for peace in the midst of conflict. Christians are to work with God in the work of redemption. We are to tell the world the good news. When I mentioned the space between " already " and "not yet", that also includes religion, which can be both a force for good and for evil.(For Christianity, there have recently been scandals of abuse in churches. [One of my followers on Twitter said her old church was abusive.]) When St. Paul criticizes the law, according to this theory he's referring to the potential of something good to be used for evil. One thing Jesus objected to was using religion to hurt people.
Another version of this is the Ransom Theory, like in Chronicles of Narnia, when Aslan takes Edmund's place when the white witch places a claim on him. So, in this version, Jesus' death was God's way of outsmarting Satan, who was holding humanity hostage. In 1863 President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, freeing many of the slaves. However many didn't find out for another two years. Similar to us: while God through Jesus paid our ransom Satan wasn't gonna let go so easily. The evangelist(evangelism is the Christian version of dawah) lets people know they are free.

Re: Ask a Christian

I believe the ritual washing in Islam is more symbolic, and ultimately a spiritual cleansing more then a physical one... Rituals create a sense of solemnity to a practice. So the ritualization of the process of spiritual cleansing prior to prayer is meant to put you in a particular state of mind. But ultimately I think the concept is similar to that of Christianity.

Re: Ask a Christian

Now for the Trinity in a nutshell: first, is three and one possible? Maybe chemistry isn’t the best analogy(not my strong point), but here we go: all matter is made of atoms, which are comprised of positively charged protons and neutrally charged neutrons orbited by negatively charged neutrons. Molecules are formed by the electrons of different atoms bonding with each other. For complex molecules the atoms can be arranged in multiple ways. From what I’ve read for some molecules they are all the arrangements and never just one.
Now as a description of God the Trinity is one Being(God) in three Persons(Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). A being is the quality or essence that makes something what it is, whereas a person is the quality or essence that makes someone who [s]he is. I am one being, a human being; a human being has only one person, in my case, the one going by Laskar Cinta on this site. The Trinity teaches that there is one All-Powerful, All-Knowing Supreme Being called God in the English language. So instead of being like human beings who have only one person God has three Persons. One label used to describe God in the New Testament is love(1 Jn 4). Love requires another; the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit have been giving to each other, serving each other for eternity.
To answer another question the reason for the creation of humans is friendship, that God desired fellowship.(Revelation 4:11 says “And for Thy[God’s] pleasure they[everything] were created.”) The universe was created for man. The purpose of the moon isn’t discussed much but in Genesis 1 the moon is mentioned as for determining times and seasons. Back to man: the plan for relationship received a monkey wrench when Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, so God decided to become a human being to fix it(explained in another post).
To answer another question since all the Persons comprising the Being known as God are all the one God both the Father and the Son are God – that is how Jesus is both God and the Son of God.

Re: Ask a Christian

1 - If Christians believe that Jesus is the son of God, and is also considered God, doesn’t that make Christianity a polythiestic religion? Jesus is referred to as “Lord” (so is God), and “Father” (so is God), that means Christians believe in 2 Gods .. ?

2 - And, taking it a bit further, if Muslims can marry any one who is ahle kitab, that means those people also believe in only ONE God like Muslims and do not associate any other thing/person/it with God. This is why Muslims are not permitted to marry Hindus for example, because they believe in multiple gods.
But, from my understanding, this is very skewed because the Christian ahle kitabs who truly believed in only God as God and Jesus a mortal were the people referenced in this “allowance” , and they existed way back in the day ( I think some may exist present day, too, but I am not sure)…

Please explain …

Re: Ask a Christian

As I mentioned in a previous post understanding how monotheism and the Trinity are compatible involves the difference between a being and a person. A being is the quality or essence that makes something what it is, whereas a person is the quality or essence that makes someone who [s]he is. Human beings are one person in one being. The Trinity teaches God is a Being(only one such Being) but is comprised of three Persons. One explanation I read is there is one God. However this God is Omnipresent, expressed as the Holy Spirit. It’s also taught that God, while remaining in heaven, simultaneously became human as Jesus. This is expressed as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – the three Persons that comprise the Being called God.
Concerning the second question there ARE nontrinitarian Christians(but they are often considered heretics): Unitarianism is the general theological name. The Unitarian Universalist Church is one(Universalist means they don’t believe in eternal damnation.) The most famous Unitarian section is Jehovah’s Witnesses, who accept Jesus as the Son of God and Savior like the other Christians but deny the Trinity and other mainstream Christian doctrines. I don’t know much about them but Christadelphians also reject the Trinity.

Re: Ask a Christian

What is your proof of them being wrong.

Re: Ask a Christian

Generally it's dueling interpretations of Scripture -- for Christadelphians they are supported by statements by Jesus such as "The Father is greater than I"; Trinitarians are supported by statements such as St. Paul's reference that at the name of Jesus "Every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father."(Philippians 2:10-11), a passage quoting Isaiah that refers to God. Both groups find ways to explain passages that lean towards the opposite view.

Re: Ask a Christian

But did not say on last page paul and red-letter are never at odds ?

Why are you sure Christadelphians are wrong?

Re: Ask a Christian

There is disagreement over how to interpret the Bible and the words of Jesus and St. Paul. For me personally I have my views but I accept the limits of my knowledge. I personally don't reject Christadelphians as not being Christians but based on arguments from both sides I find one more plausible. I can't think of a specific Trinity/Unitarian debate offhand but the Unbelievable? podcast years back had a discussion with a Christadelphian and a Christian from a more mainstream sect. Hearing both sides lay out their case helps to get an understanding of their beliefs.

Re: Ask a Christian

Peace Laskar Cinta,

Is it allowed to wear shoes in the church?

Re: Ask a Christian

Yes it is permitted,indeed customary, to wear shoes in church. In churches that dance as part of the worship, sometimes women remove their high heels for more freedom.
In some churches people dress up for services(that's probably the origin of the expression "Sunday best"), but other churches allow more casual dress, thus people come in shorts and flip flops.
As a whole people wear shoes in church unless there's a footwashing ceremony, women want more freedom of movement, or if they've slipping their flip flops on and off. (I've noticed women as more likely to remove their shoes in church.)

Re: Ask a Christian

Peace Laskar Cinta,

Please quote from the scripture that it is permitted. Thank you.

Re: Ask a Christian

The Bible doesn't say one way or another. Moses and Joshua are told to remove their shoes(Ex 3 & Joshua 5, respectively), but that is seen as referring to their particular situation, rather than a general command.

Re: Ask a Christian

Is there any such thing in Christianity like blasphemy? For example, in Islam, its disrespectful and may be blasphemous to draw pictures of Prophets etc. But in Christianity, I have seen so many Jesus memes than I could count. Does it bother evangelist or orthodox christians or even not-so-orthodox when they see Jesus portrayal in movies and social media?

Also, portrayal of jesus as a white man with long hair is rampant. The modern day image of Jesus originated sometime in 20th century. Earliest images of Jesus date back to 4th century and modern forensics have portrayed Jesus as short-hair bearded brown skin person. Jesus came from Bethlehem and hence a Semite. But still so many christians keep on insisting that he was white. What do you think about this?

Re: Ask a Christian

Peace Laskar Cinta;

If I say, then it means you are not keeping the commandment i.e., how your Prophets a.s., done you're not doing the same way.

Re: Ask a Christian

Pictures of prophets are not considered disrespectful in Christianity -- it's how they are depicted that makes it blasphemous. (I think this contributes to confusion among Christians as to controversies over pictures of prophets in Islam.)
The depiction of Jesus as white is due to tradition(and probably due to the fact it was European countries that made Christianity a state religion and thus people of European descent have had the biggest influence on interpretations of scripture). The tradition of depicting Jesus with long hair comes from a burial cloth with the imprint of a man burned into it(and some identified it as having belonged to Jesus).
I personally don't care how people depict how Jesus looked -- I care how you treat others. (In my personal opinion the greatest blasphemy is abusing/oppressing people while claiming God told you to do it. The Bible mentions God's Name being blasphemed due to the behavior of His people[Rom 2:24].)

Re: Ask a Christian

In Christianity not every action of a prophet is seen as a universal command. Prophets were told to do things as object lessons for their people; John the Baptist ate locusts and wild honey; whereas Jesus ate what everyone else ate. For something to be a command, it must be expressed as "Do this" or "Don't do that".
Even in things considered specific rather than general there is always a general principle that's to be followed and the specific refers to an application.

Re: Ask a Christian

Mary covered her head/body.. why don't Christian women do the same to follow her as a role model ?

Re: Ask a Christian

Where does it say that Mary covered her head?