Re: Are we (Muslims in West) really invulnerable?
Okay ghost this is what i have concluded from your posts, correct me if I'm wrong.
1) immigrants who are labourers are unsuccessful.
2) because they're labourers they'll never be able to integrate with whites.
3) integration is liberalism.
4) the fascist element in west doesn't exist and right wingers love Brown people.
In short, secularization and monoculture is the key for Muslims to get accepted in West.
???
Not quite.
1) Being a labourer in the 60's was not exactly helpful in terms of integrating and achieving higher education in the West. Look at African Americans in the US for example. Because it was harder, people clung to what they knew, their communities and Islam. In the end, this hurts their children and subsequent generations. I'm not saying people who came as labourers can't be unsuccessful, just that it makes it much harder to do so, and thus, fewer families had upward social mobility.
2) No. If you only associate with Muslims and Pakistanis, then you have no motivation to integrate with whites. It's not just a matter of ability, it's also a matter of desire. Desire to integrate is something that is sometimes lacking in the US and Canada as well, the problem is that the Desi communities are generally smaller, and people have a variety of careers that require interaction with non-Muslims. I visited the UK a few years ago and there was a town (sorry I don't remember the name) where I literally only saw like 2 white people. Is that helpful in terms of integration? Do you blame white people for feeling a bit threatened by that? How would you feel if a town in Pakistan was strictly white and Christian?
3) Again no. But a right wing Christian is unlikely to associate with a Muslim. Liberalism is more conducive to a harmonious society, lest we all live in segregated communities.
4) I don't think I said that. It does exist, and always will. What segregation does is make the centrists question Muslims' willingness to integrate. That's what has happened in a lot of countries in Europe, which is very unfortunate. Centrists are beginning to listen to the Geert Wilders of the world. Of course the economy and politics don't help.
Secularization is a big part of America and Canada, I'm not sure about the UK (Church of England) and the rest of Europe. If you will not meet a non-Muslim because they drink then you are excluding a lot of people from your social circle. Why stay in Western countries then? People are willing to give Muslims a chance, but we have to be willing to meet them halfway. We are in their countries. We can't demonize secularism, the same laws that empower us to live here and make any kinds of demands, and ask Westerners to adheres to Islamic principles.
Bottom line: I'm preaching tolerance and acceptance. If you believe that Muslims are inevitably going to be kicked out, then why would you stay in the West?