first of all it is not politically correct
second- I am using my experiences to give examples rather than just throw concepts around
third- the concept applies equally in business, science or personal life
fourth- anyways sorry about you..masoom..sawal
fouth- its laxatives and yes you do need them
haha... I know man... and that's why I stopped at the 2x2 without further elaboration. For me personally, I think a priori and a posteriori is a good enough approach to assumptions... something you know by definition vs. something you know by observation. Typically its a hybrid of these that we use in our personal and professional lives.
I agree, analytic and synthetic take it into a part where majority would have troiuble with teh concept let alone figuring out how to apply it.
true that! and on a similar note, on the research front, we always report the limitations of a study because often the assumptions may not be generalizable to the data that is available.
and that is the key, acknolweding inconsistencies, limitations and risks.
yes... it's called: circular dependence of theory and observation :)
sorry - I'll stop now but it's been an interesting discussion.
Indeed, i did not expect an intelelctually stimulating conversation this late.
^ documented facts prove otherwise. as I never introduced the topic of laxatives in this discussion, therefore you can only deduce it from your own statement, which then counters your counterstatement that you infact have never needed laxatives.
'think' refers to assumption not deduction... unless I would have used the word "believe"
so no thinking is required to deduce something?
okay then..
but regardless your deduction was based off your own assumption since you were the one who introduced the topic of laxatives in the conversation. thus the deduction would be of the assumption you noted, my statement was in support of your assumption that you neeeded a laxative.
oh sorry I did not realize you were done with the whole laxatives thing now.
so time to return the topic back to the discussion on assumptions then? kewl.
Huh? I was talking about myself. It was you who started taking shots at my sentence which was done and over with after my reply of 'not having any of it ever' :)
challo thats good. kewl, so why dont u now go toss all this irrelevent stuff which is otherwise messing up a pretty good thread. lucid and I were really having a good discussion. too bad dushi was not around, this i probably right up her alley.
my alley :> has gone under reconstruction, dear Fraudia bhai, as i am noting, most contractors are bidding unfair tenders at the building contract, so i will be asking all business contractors to re submit their contractual proposals & upon the next post, i will determine who gets the contract of building friendship. that is probably the hardest thing, sometimes to do, for all of us, at point in time.