Re: An ode to Shaukat Aziz
**:hmmm:**You mean … it does not matter that the writer (Shakir) of the article is wriring BS or not? Just because you want to read his BS and accept it, quote his lies to further spread lies … and that is fine with you and when it is pointed out to you .. this is what you have to say, is that … ‘it does not matter’?
As for screwing up the economy … again that is spreading lies, misinformation, and propaganda … just what journalist like Shakir does. If you do not know the fact than why comment? and if you know, why not quote the state of economy when Shaukat Aziz took over and compare that with present economy?
I have already done that many time and if you want to, I can do that again.
Now you are trying to spread misinformation about my post too … as you want to show contradiction in my post when there is none … 
Here you quoted my post to show contradiction.
Brother, have you read my post and understood it or I have to explain that too … but if I do, many would say that I write long post … and if I do not, it seems that people intentionally try to misunderstand my post 
Well, here is it … if you had read my post, you would not have asked:
The corrupt liar wiriter Shakir wrote that … Shaukat Aziz was private banker … read his article (I pointed out in my last post too).
But shaukat Aziz was not private banker (read the extrct of senate report). He was sent to private bank as head of Private bank for particular job on especial assignment (that was in May 1997 … and he stayed there until he left for Pakistan in Oct 1999 … for 19 months). His job in private bank was not as Private banker but to head Private bank and imprive Private bank’s lausy audits. Also to review Private bank’s handling of public figures accounts … to initiate fundamental review of the privare bank (as what American government bank regulators asked the bank).
From Senate report (I posted):
Among other actions, in May 1997, Mr. Reed replaced the head of the private bank. He selected Shaukat Aziz, a longtime Citibank executive not previously associated with the private bank. He told the Subcommittee staff that he charged Mr. Aziz with improving what Mr. Reed called the private bank’s “lousy audits.” He indicated that he also asked Mr. Aziz to review the private bank’s handling of public figures accounts, and to initiate the “fundamental review” of the private bank requested by bank regulators. In a November 1997 letter to the Board of Directors, Mr. Reed wrote the following:
So, when he left Private bank … he did not left as private banker … but from what especial assignment he was given in private bank.
As for economy of Pakistan … let see if he made it or destroyed it: This is what happened to the economy of Pakistan … judge yourself.
GDP growth of Pakistan over different periods (in dollars):
Pakistan economy in 1958 was $ 3.6 billions
Pakistan economy in 1969 was $ 9.7 billions
GDP Increase of $ 6.1 billions in 11 years (1958-69) of Ayub Khan was @ 9.4 percent per year.
Pakistan economy in 1972 was $11.4 billions
Pakistan economy in 1977 was $15.8 billions
GDP Increase of $ 4.4 billions in 5 years of ZA Bhutto rule was @ 6.7 percent per year.
Pakistan economy in 1977 was $15.8 billions
Pakistan economy in 1988 was $40 billions
GDP Increase of $ 24.2 billions in 11 years of Zia rule was @ 8.8 percent per year.
Pakistan economy in 1988 was $40 billions
Pakistan economy in 1999 was $62.2 billions
GDP Increase of $ 22.2 billions in 11 years of corrupts duo (BB and NS) rule was @ 4.1 percent per year.
Pakistan economy in 1999 was $62.2 billions
Pakistan economy in 2007 was $146.3 billions
****GDP Increase of $ 84.1 billions in 8 years of Musharraf rule was @ 11.3 percent per year. … What a thumping economical growth ****
[Is that what you call … screwing the economy of Pakistan when it was the highest ever economical growth period in Pakistan history?]