[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
It's not what you know, its what you can prove!
There has been cases against Azam Tariq. Not a single of them have been proven.
[/QUOTE]
Exactly Pappu - Now go and tell this to Malik73,Nadia and Mad Scientist.
Modi also may have cases against him but I dont know how many of them are or can be proved in a court of law. It doesn't mean that either Azam Tariq or Modi are clean.
To me both of them are guilty of inciting violence and man slaughter.
Modi staged Gujarat Genocide. This was stated by the Human Rights Watch.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Modi staged Gujarat Genocide. This was stated by the Human Rights Watch.
[/QUOTE]
Read the human rights watch report about sectarian violence - you will find the name of 'Azam Tariq' in Golden letters.
Yes, his name present in the reports without any evidence associates with him.
You can call me a fanatic if I just hold a gun.
On further account, the most wanted Sectarian Terrorist was Riaz Bashra, who has been killed in encounter.
God bless CID.
My goodness - Had ho gayee, Instead of condemning, Pakis are defending ‘Azam Tariq’ now and telling us that he is innocent. HRW must be biased.
About Riaz Basra Here is a glimpse of how popular he was in Pakistan
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/Forum26/HTML/007318.html
What does that have to with my comments, Asif?
Aren't you gettin' bit over?
In your defence, you presented a link of people who supported Bashra, which I'm totally against it.
Why are you associatin' that with my comments?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by 2bornot2b: *
Malik, the facist Hindus on these boards let their mask down once in a while and show their true colours.
[/QUOTE]
Which is what Talwar did in defence of Modi, which all can surely read. One or two supposed "condemnations", and then his mask slipped when he said -
***Let's see any evidence you have where Mr.Modi ordered the killings personally
There is no legal proof that Modi was responsible for the Gujarat massacre.***
So now you agree that Talwar did condemn the incident. Now Did he used the word ‘Supposed’ or is it just pure assumption on your part as per your ususal habit ?
Btw - Care to read the above statements of PT - He is defending ‘Azam Tariq’ (In stead of condemning) and insists that Mr. Tariq doesn’t have any evidence against him that’s why he is innocent. What a hippocrisy. looking forward to more of your comments.
Still no condemnation of ‘Azam Tariq’ - Not even a so called Supposed one. 
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
Btw - Care to read the above statements of PT - He is defending 'Azam Tariq' (In stead of condemning) and insists that Mr. Tariq doesn't have any evidence against him that's why he is innocent. What a hippocrisy. looking forward to more of your comments.
[/quote]
Whoa....
You gotta attitude problem. First look at the quotin' you did in response to my comments. Why duckin' that? Does my comments related to your link story? Yes or No.
You're gettin' personal. That's it.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
Modi also may have cases against him but I dont know how many of them are or can be proved in a court of law...
[/QUOTE]
Namaste Asif_K :)
Good to see all the Hindus now coming to the defence of the 'Muslim Burning Hindu' Modi.
Good Ol' hypocrite Indians. One-by-one they are all letting their masks slip :)
Ohh Look who is out of caves - You must have drunk something really strong which prevented you from reading furthur:-
Here is the remaining "To me both of them are guilty of inciting violence and man slaughter."
Btw - I was just enlightening your friends about their own analogy - they think 'Azam Tariq' was innocent because he doesn't have any cases against him but when it comes to modi they just say the opposite.
Namaste Asif_K 
