America puts Iraq up for Sale

Iraq was in effect put up for sale yesterday when the American-appointed administration announced it was opening up all sectors of the economy to foreign investors in a desperate attempt to deliver much-needed reconstruction against a daily backdrop of kidnappings, looting and violent death.

In an unexpected move unveiled at the meeting in Dubai of the Group of Seven rich nations, the Iraqi Governing Council announced sweeping reforms to allow total foreign ownership without the need for prior approval.

The initiative bore all the hallmarks of Washington’s ascendant neoconservative lobby, complete with tax cuts and trade tariff rollbacks. It will apply to everything from industry to health and water, although not oil.

But it is still likely to feed concerns that Iraq is being turned into a golden opportunity for profiteering by multinational corporations relying on their political connections.

Already, **the biggest reconstruction contracts have been allocated to American firms such as Bechtel and Halliburton, which have ties to the Bush administration. They were selected behind closed doors, with no opportunity for competitors to present bids. **

Five months after the overthrow of Saddam, there are no visible signs of reconstruction. Clean water and electricity are still not available to most people and entire neighborhoods are still without phone lines.

Washington is desperately seeking help with footing the $100bn bill it estimates rebuilding Iraq will cost.
America puts iraq up for Sale!

Not about the money or Oil US=Liar!

^^ no surprise there, have known it for quite a while

See, in theory, this would have been a good thing.. but it's just too early for any of it. Doing it now is like a pawn dealer cutting short your term. If you're busting your balls trying to buy back what you pawned and then he says "too late, I already sold it" when you finally do have the money with time to spare, how nice is that?! It is good to inject foreign investment into Iraq, but it would be better if the Iraqis themselves could own some of these large industries. Let's hope the sales are done well, otherwise it might later become a recipe for a radical's rise to power on an industry nationalization ticket.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by spoon: *
See, in theory, this would have been a good thing.. but it's just too early for any of it. Doing it now is like a pawn dealer cutting short your term. If you're busting your balls trying to buy back what you pawned and then he says "too late, I already sold it" when you finally do have the money with time to spare, how nice is that?! It is good to inject foreign investment into Iraq, but it would be better if the Iraqis themselves could own some of these large industries. Let's hope the sales are done well, otherwise it might later become a recipe for a radical's rise to power on an industry nationalization ticket.
[/QUOTE]

Sales are done well?

You joking right the sales of the industries and utililities are going to Bush and his Corrupt government freinds

some recent examples include
Haliburton ** Cheneys firm** gets the oil contracts
Bechtel ** Cheney again and George Shultz regans right hand man** got 1 billion plus for contruction in iraq

These sales are not even up for bidding in most cases they will be handed out like sweets to the America corps!

The railways, the Ports like umm qasr, the roads everything Iraq has got a Huge FOR SALE sign courtesy of the puppet US iraq council

You think the sale of water with sanitation plants including control of the river tigris and euphrates is going to be any different ( these rivers alone make iraq the best source of water in the middle east)

How about the banking system in iraq

they will all be in hands of the corpotrate few who organised this masscre called a war in the first place!

As one western commentator summed it up this is Bush's Bomb before you Buy war!

Any beach side property, preferably non-DU but that's optional I'm thinking of buying it up and selling timeshares to New Yorkers, they can't get enough of an exotic experience.

Why shouldn't joe public in the US get a taste of all this, afterall it's their tax dollars that's paying for it.

Haley Barbour?
Salem Chalabi?
Joe Allbaugh?
Doug Feith?
INC/Kamil Mubdir al-Kaylani?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Thap: *
Any beach side property, preferably non-DU but that's optional I'm thinking of buying it up and selling timeshares to New Yorkers, they can't get enough of an exotic experience.

Why shouldn't joe public in the US get a taste of all this, afterall it's their tax dollars that's paying for it.
[/QUOTE]

Thap you have missed the point completly

Joe Public in the US des'nt even get a sniff of it!

read the post again then comment!

click on the names above.. that's who's getting it

Getting the rights to distribute Procter & Gamble products would be a gold mine,” said one of the partners at New Bridge who did not want to be named. “One well-stocked 7-Eleven could knock out 30 Iraqi stores; a Wal-Mart could take over the country,” he said.

..from Lobbyists Set Sights On Money-Making Opportunities in Iraq

Well people in the ME need soap. Start in Iraq and move to syria....to supply soap that is.

Salem Chalabi? :rolleyes: Nephew of Mr. Ahmed Chalabi, aka Mr. wanted-for-embezzlement-by-Jordan, jet-setter from one conference to another, funded by the US government.

What a wonderful concept. Devastate a country, then give yourself and your buddies, lucrative contracts to re-rebuild it. And then people wonder why “they” hate the US government.

Who cares whether these terrorist sympathizers hate the US. Let the business go on. Economics is a the best unifier.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Matsui: *
Well people in the ME need soap. Start in Iraq and move to syria....to supply soap that is.
[/QUOTE]

and throw in a free loofah once it reaches Israel..they're gonna need it.

Atleast Dubby got what he wanted - decimation of this previously strong economy.

Iraq will be poor ‘for years’, BBC, 2 October 2003

Iraq will remain impoverished for years to come because oil will not fund public spending, aid will fall short of what is needed and few companies will want to invest there, a report leaked to Reuters news agency has said.

Even if oil prices are favourable, stability is achieved and debts are largely written off, Iraq’s economy will not reach even half the size it was in the 1970s, the US-based Institute of International Finance (IIF) said in a document sent to its members and quoted by Reuters.

The grim predictions come as governments and international agencies meet in Madrid to prepare for an Iraq donors’ conference later this month. Reconstruction costs in Iraq are estimated to amount to at least $75bn but so far pledges stand at $20bn from the US and a mere $230m from the EU.

The IFF - a leading banking body in Washington - did not deny circulating the report quoted by Reuters but refused to comment on its contents.

The report said that Iraq’s GDP (gross domestic product) per head would not surpass $3,500 in the next 10-15 years. The country’s GDP per head reached $7,000 in the late 1970s, but economic mismanagement, three wars and 13 years of sanctions has pushed that to around $1,000 per capita, a level which rates it among the world’s poorest countries.

Elsewhere in the region, Saudi Arabia, for example, has had GDP per capita of $9,000 over the past five years.

Iraq has massive debts which the IIF estimates at $134bn, or 400% of gross domestic product. The report said that assuming an oil price of $25 a barrel in 2004 and oil exports reaching no more than 2.5 million barrels per day by the end of next year, export revenues would be $10bn.

“Given that it could take up to $15bn to cover recurrent public expenditure in 2004, this would leave the government with a financing gap of around $5bn,” the report said. “If reconstruction costs are added, the public financing gap in 2004 is set to be far larger, perhaps as much as $15 bn,” it added.

Foreign investment is expected to fill some of the gap, but the IIF said private companies would be reluctant to invest in Iraq until stability is achieved.

“Reconstruction is therefore likely to be a slow process, ensuring that Iraq remains a poor country for years to come,” the report said.

^ thankyou Saddam. :k:

Economics is the best unifier! hmmm no you are wrong again on that one.

You ever heard of the rich poor divide

And just to proove my point an article that shows Economics is not the best unifier even in the richest country in the world.
Over 34 Million Americans Live in Poverty, Says Report!