Re: All about losing weight.
Well, I’ve never actually been fat. Hence clearly they’d be irrelevant. Maybe someone else might along the way?
If you two read the whole part and not just the bits and bobs someone posted, you’d understand Diet and Exercise were both given equal emphasis on. Infact, more on nutrition if you read the last part.
‘Exercise is king, nutrition is queen. Put them together, and u have a beautiful kingdom**. Which means you cant do one without the other. Whether you want to gain weight or lose weight - its completely about your discipline in and out of the kitchen.**’
Would you ever hear a nutritionist say, nutrition is less important/vital? Similarly, will a trainer ever tell you training/exercise is less important and diet is more? I’ll admit though, I’ve never been too fond of most, either a trainer or a nutritionist. Hence why I decided years ago to do my own research and implement it on myself. If either of them make a mistake, who’s going to suffer? I’d much rather blame myself than someone I’ve been paying to do less than what I myself could do.
Fromw hat I’ve read, I understand that exercise is termed ‘king’ because no matter how many calories you take in, exercise can and will burn it all off for you (provided you go the extra mile). Additionally and imo exercise is difficult/intense while eating isn’t hence perhaps the X factor?
Curiosity again. Will one be able to achieve say a Salma Hayek or Angelina Jolie figure with only nutrition?
Cheers.
we are just pulling your leg, silly!
Take it from a former anorexic, you don’t need to exercise to lose weight and you can get Angelina Jolie’s body just by dieting. BTW, she IS anorexic. As for Salma Hayek’s body type, that’s what you get when you maintain good healthy diet w/ some Pilates like workout routine. I tried every diet and exercise program under the sun when I was anorexic. Yeah, I was stupid…
