What I am saying is that it will impact them directly. We have deviated a bit from a thread so this is my last word on the concept of charity among the immigrants. Fix your leaky roof first before worrying about some shnook who feel some mild attraction to because he looks int he same direction when praying.
As far as the law goes..I am all for this kind of diligence. If I ever found out that someone I know was up to know good, I would kick the siht out of them first then call the police.
yeah mat i think we have gone on a tangent but this could be a good discussion on the issue of charity.
It will impact them directly..eventually..until then they have no problem in being fat, dumb and happy and completely oblivious to the need within their community. It will have to be the younger generation to bring about a change.
sleeper cells in the UK do me a favour, belive me there is nothing worth bombing in the UK anyway and furthur more it does'nt achive anything except give the kuffar more excuses to vilify and attack muslims.
these sensationalised headlines about al qaidah here there and everywhere are just beyond a joke they are there just to scare the public!
The UK government have yet to turn up any evidence of this mysterious al qaidah, why is that don't tell me i know this mysterious group also have the ability to become invisible at will!
Showkot, diplomatic relations with the United States is forbidden by Hizb ut Tahrir thus discussion of 'Islamic' thoughts with non-muslims from America or those who support America are as well, one would think.
What do you mean the sharia laws are vague, can you please give an example?
Also you mentiom fanatics who have hijacked your religion, can you give an example of who these people are and how they have done this? From where do you get your definition of fanatic from? Also you mention up to no good, what do you mean by this?
underthedome
What do you mean diplomatic relations with the west is forbidden? And who said discussion with non-muslims was forbidden. The first point is refering to states and the second to individuals.
What do you mean the sharia laws are vague, can you please give an example?
lets see debate on interest, to beard, to purdah..if they are not vague why are assorted schools of thoughts arguing about interpretation.
Also you mentiom fanatics who have hijacked your religion, can you give an example of who these people are and how they have done this?
lets see, sipah e sahaba, lashkar e jhangvi, sipah e muhammad, tehrik e jafaria comes to mind who are killing one another in the name of religion.
** From where do you get your definition of fanatic from? **
someone who would use, twist, adapt anything to help serve their own backward minds...the organizations noted above and their supporters come to mind, as well as people who are killing innocent civilians in suicide bombings.
Also you mention up to no good, what do you mean by this?
how does killing innocent ppl sound, as an example...