Stupid 6 year old bacha being humiliated all over the board…
Does your mom know what kind of a ‘bad bacha’ you’re over the net?
BTW… everyone who humiliates you is Illiterate? Anyone who tells the truth about you is Illiterate?
![]()
Stupid 6 year old bacha being humiliated all over the board…
Does your mom know what kind of a ‘bad bacha’ you’re over the net?
BTW… everyone who humiliates you is Illiterate? Anyone who tells the truth about you is Illiterate?
![]()
not everyone .. just you ![]()
GUYS STOP THIS FIGHTING AND ****. COME ON. WATS THE USE.
IF U WANNA PROVE SOEMTHING GO OUT IN TEH REAL WORLD AND DO SOMETHING. THERE IS NO USE OF BRINGING OUT HATRED ON GS. WE SHOULD TRY TO KEEP IT FRIENDLY.
to the rest >>>> can u guyz imagine if PROUDPAKI007 and AATIF meet up someday ??? :kaboom:
…n e wayz,.
forever!!!
hahahaha .. ya I seriously never thot of that .. it will be a helluva a meet ![]()
k… fine… Aatif, stop with all these personal attacks and I’ll do the same.
But Please, tell me… the article posted below, gimme a valid opinion, dont take it the wrong way, I mean no disrespect to you or India but gimme a valid response on the below article. please…
Prithvi-II missile inducted into IAF
Vishal Thapar
New Delhi, October 22
The 250-km range Prithvi-II surface-to-surface ballistic missile has been inducted into the Indian Air Force (IAF). This makes the IAF the only air force in the world with surface-to-surface ballistic missiles under its command. But the missile has left the IAF cold.
The Prithvi-II is the Air Force version of the 150-km Prithvi earlier inducted into the Indian Army.
For the IAF, which is still smarting under the missile turf war largely considered to have been won by the Army, the Prithvi-II is poor consolation.
“Operationally, Prithvi-II makes no sense, especially when the 2500 km Agni missile has been given to the Army. The IAF didn’t need a lollipop. It’s a waste of manpower and money. Let one service (Army) handle all the surface-to-surface missiles,” snorts a senior IAF officer.
The argument is that the strike aircraft outperform the Prithvi-II any day in terms of range, accuracy and weaponload, and hence, there was no such requirement for the IAF.
While the missile can carry a 500 kg warhead up to 250 km, aircraft like the SU-30 carry an eight ton weaponload over a far greater distance.
Defence sources say the Prithvi-II is meant for “training and familiarisation”. “It is to supplement strike aircraft. It has a definite role in circumstances when strike aircraft cannot fly, but one needs to keep the pressure up,” a policy planner justified.
But for the IAF, the rub is in having lost out in its perceived role as the pre-eminent strategic force. The Prithvi is not meant to carry a nuclear warhead. That role is the Agni’s, to be handled by the Army.
“Operationally, Prithvi-II makes no sense, especially when the 2500 km Agni missile has been given to the Army. The IAF didn’t need a lollipop. It’s a waste of manpower and money. Let one service (Army) handle all the surface-to-surface missiles,”
well I think this unknown IAF officer has no clue what he is talking about. not everything that you research on is put to use. prithvi research team has carried out various tests that will help them develop future missiles with more advancement and newer technology. apart from that, prithvi project has its own purpose. different tasks require different strategies. IAF will not use strike fighters or agni at all the times. there will be tasks specifically for prithvi 2! Its like saying why to buy a motorbike when you can buy a car and forgetting the pros n cons of both of them!! I hope u get my point.
Aatif
man if aatif was a hindu indian i wouldhave kicked his a$$ . but man i think tat wat is more important then him being an indian is tat he is amuslim. man we all know how much we hate india. but lets keep the hate for the hindus. we can spare our bro's.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by eddy: *
man if aatif was a hindu indian i wouldhave kicked his a$$ . but man i think tat wat is more important then him being an indian is tat he is amuslim. man we all know how much we hate india. but lets keep the hate for the hindus. we can spare our bro's.
[/QUOTE]
Eddy > if you were hindu, I wouldn't have done anything! Just a thought! And please dont tell me you dont have any hindu or christian friends!
eddy > :nono::nono::nono:
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by queer: *
obviously, these pics show the temporary paint from an airshow peeling. no one goes on training or combat missions painted in the tricolor.
and here is an old chinese saying for umair: a Sukoi in hand is worth four F-16s in bush's bush.
[/QUOTE]
queer praa chhaa gaye tussi.. tussi tay anil kapoor jia gallan kardey ho.. o bha, 1 question for ya - aircrafts etc. are assets, national pride, I would assume they don't deserve to be adored with something like "temporary paint" whatsoever the reason be. Anyways, you drove home a good point in any case.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Aatif: *
well I think this unknown IAF officer has no clue what he is talking about. not everything that you research on is put to use. prithvi research team has carried out various tests that will help them develop future missiles with more advancement and newer technology. apart from that, prithvi project has its own purpose. different tasks require different strategies. IAF will not use strike fighters or agni at all the times. there will be tasks specifically for prithvi 2! Its like saying why to buy a motorbike when you can buy a car and forgetting the pros n cons of both of them!! I hope u get my point.
Aatif
[/QUOTE]
Ok... but why is he dissing his own his country's AF? He is afterall an officer and he has no clue what he is talking about? You sure?
And also, explain the purpose and the usage of STS missiles by IAF.
No AF in the world uses STF missiles besides India...
Please explain!
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Aatif: *
Eddy > if you were hindu, I wouldn't have done anything! Just a thought! And please dont tell me you dont have any hindu or christian friends!
[/QUOTE]
u see man my hindu and christian friends arent like u. tats why. get it?\
ur stubbornness makes u only one of a kind.
so gupppies kick this niggas a$$. he loves to get it in his behind. so give it to him
obviously I am one of a kind ![]()
anyways .. please no kicking behinds now! :nono:
Muslim Muslim Bhai Bhai ![]()
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Proudpaki007: *
Ok... but why is he dissing his own his country's AF? He is afterall an officer and he has no clue what he is talking about? You sure?
And also, explain the purpose and the usage of STS missiles by IAF.
No AF in the world uses STF missiles besides India...
Please explain!
[/QUOTE]
I dont think India is the only country with surface to surface missiles!
And I am not an IAF officer, so I have nothing more to explain. Also, Pakistan has STS missiles [Hatf-V (Ghauri)] as well. Care to explain why?
Its good .. we are having some good discussion now!
Thanks
Aatif
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Aatif: *
I dont think India is the only country with surface to surface missiles!
And I am not an IAF officer, so I have nothing more to explain. Also, Pakistan has STS missiles [Hatf-V (Ghauri)] as well. Care to explain why?
Its good .. we are having some good discussion now!
Thanks
Aatif
[/QUOTE]
Yep.. Pak does have STS missiles but they are used as delivery system.
[quote]
This makes the IAF the only air force in the world with surface-to-surface ballistic missiles under its command. But the missile has left the IAF cold.
[/quote]
Above quote Is from the same article I posted...
I meant as IAF as only airfoce with STS missiles ...
Pak has sts missiles for delivery system.... numerous of other countries do also.
But... like I said... no AF uses sts missiles besides IAF.
well that makes IAF unique .. innit? :)
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Aatif: *
well that makes IAF unique .. innit? :)
[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't think so... since your own IAF officer said this idea is stupid.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Proudpaki007: *
I wouldn't think so... since your own IAF officer said this idea is stupid.
[/QUOTE]
ohh I was being sarcastic!!
and I dont think that news source is valid in any case. can u please repost the link coz its not working! this is all gossip .. they prolly interviewed some peon at the IAF HQ I guess!