LOL. Spock bhaijan. Pakistan has proved itself to be the biggest proliferator of Nuclear Weapons Technology to terrorist countries. Rather than making baseless allegations against Great President Musharaf, the greatest Pakistani leader since Quaid-e-Azam, you should be asking for a UN/IAEA inquiry into the heinous crime of proliferation carried out by Pakistan so that the real culprits could be identified. Wouldn't you want to see that? :)
Again, correction, this isnt a crime Pakistan committed, its a crime that Musharraf the retarded general, and aQ Khan committed.
Re: A Q Khan: 'Pakistan Government knew/part of nuclear proliferation'
Aalsi, for a person that praises a dictator turned illegal "President", i shouldn't be surprised if you call Pakistan a terrorist state. Then why still post in PA and pretend like you care about the nation?
its a crime that Musharraf the retarded general, and aQ Khan committed.
LOL. Spock bhaijan, once again baseless accusation without proof against the Great President Musharaf, the greatest Pakistani leader since Quaid-e-Azam. Only a UN/IAEA inquiry can prove to you who has been involved, is that why you are afraid of such an inquiry? :)
Aalsi, for a person that praises a dictator turned illegal "President", i shouldn't be surprised if you call Pakistan a terrorist state.
vigiratus bhaijan. No one is calling Pakistan a terrorist state - only criticizing the the heinous crime of proliferation done by it. Are you for, or against, the proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Technology to terrorists states by Pakistanis that have brought shame and an 'irresponsible nuclear state' tag to the great nation?
LOL. Spock bhaijan, once again baseless accusation without proof against the Great President Musharaf, the greatest Pakistani leader since Quaid-e-Azam. Only a UN/IAEA inquiry can prove to you who has been involved, is that why you are afraid of such an inquiry? :)
Why would I be afraid of an IAEA inquiry? You were the one who should be afraid of it, just like how you were afraid of the UN inquiry about Benazir's murder. The noose is getting tight Aalsi! hehe
vigiratus bhaijan. No one is calling Pakistan a terrorist state - only criticizing the the heinous crime of proliferation done by it.
It refers to the millions of ordinary Pakistanis who hate the person who committed the proliferation, and is the president right now. It is not 'it' who proliferated, it was Musharraf, and his pawns.
**
Defence Minister Chaudry Ahmad Mukhtar said on Wednesday that though the nation considered Dr AQ Khan its hero, he did not consider him one, as he knew a lot about him.**
Talking to Waqt TV, Mukhtar said lifting restrictions on the movement of the nuclear scientist could pose threats to his life.
He said the Pakistan People’s Party wanted a civilian president and the Senate election would have to be waited for to impeach President Musharraf.
Referring to US unilateral strike inside Pakistan, he said the US had mistakenly attacked Pakistani areas.
^ woh kia hay ke jab woh attack karnay jaa rahay thay to Pakistan/Afghanistan ka map le jana bhool gaye thay
I am not sure you have seen the area or know about fire fight in close proximity. The incident took place within 100 yards from three positions: the position of Afghans, Talibs, and Pakistani post.
If NATO brought in air-power the mistakes would be made.
People who clamor to the anti-American slogans fail to mention a simple fact.
Pakistani soldiers killed by Taliban = 2000 +
Pakistani soldiers killed by NATO forces = 10 +
However this thread is about AQK. I think Pak government needs to decide about him and soon. The way he talks, he should be either given to IAEA for further investigation. Or he should be put back under house arrest.
If he is given to IAEA, and the investigations prove that some pakistani generals were involved, then they all should be punished by International crimes court. AQK will obviously be punished unless he becomes a "witness". That would be something. A Pakistani HERO to be a prosecution witness against Pakistan army. Wow. That will be pinnacle of AQK's life! sitting in Hague telling all the secrets of Pakistani Nuclear program. Whatta hero!
I am not sure you have seen the area or know about fire fight in close proximity. The incident took place within 100 yards from three positions: the position of Afghans, Talibs, and Pakistani post.
If NATO brought in air-power the mistakes would be made.
As if the planes today don't have GPS, they couldn't figure out where they are hitting? As if no strikes have been made in Pakistani border in past?
People who clamor to the anti-American slogans fail to mention a simple fact.
Pakistani soldiers killed by Taliban = 2000 +
Pakistani soldiers killed by NATO forces = 10 +
Its not about how many, lets see if this was "one time" mistake or repeats itself. If you wanted to imply that I don't criticise Taliban for their attacks on Pakistan/Pakistani-army but only criticise NATO forces then you are mistaken.
However this thread is about AQK. I think Pak government needs to decide about him and soon. The way he talks, he should be either given to IAEA for further investigation. Or he should be put back under house arrest.
If he is given to IAEA, and the investigations prove that some pakistani generals were involved, then they all should be punished by International crimes court. AQK will obviously be punished unless he becomes a "witness". That would be something. A Pakistani HERO to be a prosecution witness against Pakistan army. Wow. That will be pinnacle of AQK's life! sitting in Hague telling all the secrets of Pakistani Nuclear program. Whatta hero!
Wouldn't that be written with golden letters if history was written by Mush? oh wait, he is the army man.
GPS??? Oh bro! Sketch a triangle 100 yards apart. Put NATO on one point of triangle, Taliban on second and Pakistani post on the third. Then either spin the triangle or make the occupants quickly run across the triangle. Then I’ll ask you to use your GPS (military issued BTW) to hit the target.
^ haven't we come across "friendly fire" quite a few times in Iraq/Afghanistan already?
Read Pakistani and Indian war history. There are several incidents of friendly fire.
Afghan or Iraq war has more air power used on small irregular insurgents. Thus the chances of mistakes are much higher compared to the wars where armies fight with pre-determined battle plan.
Remember Murphy's Law ("If anything can go wrong, it will") was invented by the military guys.
In the heat of a battle, the dust, the smoke, the sound, etc. overwhelms even experienced soldiers. And sometimes in the confusion ground or air troops fire at their own position.
Anyways this thread is about AQK so let's not de rail it. Thank you.
That’s a good one.