Re: A GS democracy?
arshad good points btw mod duties and rules, and roles and responsibilities etc will be placed
rules is a whole diff story, as they say you can create something pretty idiot proof and then a ebtter idiot comes around :) thats where ppl then have to extrapolate and all, and thats what gets them in hot water.
so far what I am reading is that aside from some weaknesses and errors, the format we have generally works well, i.e. strong leadership team providing consistency picking operational team which they feel can align operationalize the strategy.
admittedly we have not done the best job at it, especially over last few years, which will change, and this is part of it.
now, additional point, how would a user advisory group work here?
I think it would be beneficial to have an advisory group. I did mention previously in a thread in feedback that there should be a focus group and changes should be implemented only after input from the focus group.