What are you babbling about? Those Muslim kingdoms were constantly dealing with uprisings among their mostly Hindu subjects.
Mind your language janab.
Squabbles may be but the muslims didnt want a seperate state did they. If it was a muslim king who was ruling then then they can suppress their hindu brothers as much as they want and still not a whimper from muslim neighbors. Aka kashmiri pandits and muslim neighbors. Isnt it.
Pakistan did sign a standstill agreement with the Maharaja. India did not. Go look it up.
If it was I am sorry. But I could have hardly imagined that they would have had entered into standstill agreement and then break it by actively supporting rebellion in the kingdom.
You're just playing word games now.
You are playing with words. India was just created and still all the turmoil of partition and state demarcation wasnt over.
Ha ha. you say that because you want to compare Afghanistan to Kashmir. Good for you.
You people are nothing but colonialists, and if the past century has taught us anything, its that imperialism can never successfully suppress the will of an entire nation.
British or french had nothing common with India or Algeria. Present day India was created with kashmir in it. India did not conquer it neither it occupied it by war.
If a state within Indian union rebels for no reason than religion then India has absolute full right to take action on them and to make them see reason. No outside country support such kind of accession demands.