• Accomplished
  • Aggravated
  • Amused
  • Angry
  • Annoyed
  • Anxious
  • Apathetic
  • Artistic
  • Awake
  • Bitchy
  • Blah
  • Blank
  • Bored
  • Bouncy
  • Busy
  • Calm
  • Cheerful
  • Chipper
  • Cold
  • Complacent
  • Confused
  • Contemplative
  • Content
  • Cranky
  • Crappy
  • Crazy
  • Creative
  • Crushed
  • Curious
  • Cynical
  • Depressed
  • Determined
  • Devious
  • Dirty
  • Disappointed
  • Discontent
  • Disgusted
  • Distressed
  • Ditzy
  • Dorky
  • Drained
  • Drunk
  • Ecstatic
  • Embarrassed
  • Energetic
  • Enraged
  • Enthralled
  • Envious
  • Exanimate
  • Excited
  • Exhausted
  • Flirty
  • Frustrated
  • Full
  • Geeky
  • Giddy
  • Giggly
  • Gloomy
  • Good
  • Grateful
  • Groggy
  • Grumpy
  • Guilty
  • Happy
  • High
  • Hopeful
  • Horny
  • Hot
  • Hungry
  • Hyper
  • Impressed
  • Indescribable
  • Indifferent
  • Infuriated
  • Intimidated
  • Irate
  • Irritated
  • Jealous
  • Jubilant
  • Lazy
  • Lethargic
  • Listless
  • Lonely
  • Loved
  • Melancholy
  • Mellow
  • Mischievous
  • Moody
  • Morose
  • Naughty
  • Nauseated
  • Nerdy
  • Nervous
  • Nostalgic
  • Numb
  • Okay
  • Optimistic
  • Pakistan
  • Peaceful
  • Pensive
  • Pessimistic
  • Pissedoff
  • Pleased
  • Predatory
  • Productive
  • Quixotic
  • Recumbent
  • Refreshed
  • Rejected
  • Rejuvenated
  • Relaxed
  • Relieved
  • Restless
  • Rushed
  • Sad
  • Satisfied
  • Scared
  • Shocked
  • Sick
  • Silly
  • Sleepy
  • Sore
  • Stressed
  • Surprised
  • Sympathetic
  • Thankful
  • Thirsty
  • Thoughtful
  • Tired
  • Touched
  • Uncomfortable
  • Weird
  • Working
  • Worried
  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
    Results 37 to 41 of 41
    1. #37

      High
       

      IsaidwhatIsaid's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 13, 2017
      Location
      The South
      Posts
      300
      Post Thanks / Like
      Blogs
      1
      Mentioned
      3 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Indian ruling-party member offers bounty for beheading of Bollywood’s biggest female star

      The release of a highly anticipated Bollywood blockbuster has been delayed after a politician from India's governing party offered a bounty of $1.5 million for the heads of the movie's star and director amid outcry that the film distorted Hindu legend.

      The movie “Padmavati” — depicting the life of legendary 14th-century queen Padmini — sparked the latest in a string of flash points from right-wing groups that perceive more clout under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has courted Hindu nationalists as part of his political base.
      Often Hindu outrage is stoked by little more than rumors, including deadly riots and vigilante violence over false claims that Muslims were killing cows sacred to Hindu culture. But this time with the film, the reason for the outrage is even more puzzling.
      Members of the Rajput Karni Sena, a group associated with the warrior Rajput caste, claim it misrepresents history by depicting a love affair between the queen and a Muslim invader. The group is further upset that the queen's midriff is exposed in a song sequence. They have called for a nationwide strike and backed the death threats against star Deepika Padukone and the film's director, Sanjay Leela Bhansali.
      But Bhansali insists that the plot has no such love scene. And the movie trailer pays ample homage to Rajput bravery and their role in resisting Muslim armies.


      The death threats — against one of India's most popular actresses and a prominent filmmaker — brought quick backlash. They were sharply denounced by leaders of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, or BJP, and the home minister in the southern Karnataka state, Ramalinga Reddy, ordered protection for Padukone and her family.
      Also at stake are the boundaries for the world's most prolific film industry, in which some directors have increasingly tried to push back against decades of film censorship for political reasons.
      Chief ministers of a number of states demanded that controversial scenes be removed before the film is screened. The movie's producers have indefinitely delayed the film's release.
      The news agency ANI reported that Surajpal Amu, a state-level media coordinator of the BJP, told a rally Sunday: “We will reward the ones beheading [Padukone and Bhansali] with Rs 10 crore, and also take care of their family’s needs.” A crore signifies 10 million rupees.
      Amu repeated the statement to the Indian Express. Video from the rally also showed Amu saying, “There's no need to discuss making cuts to the film. We won't allow it to play in theaters at all.”
      An official from the BJP condemned Amu and said the party was considering taking legal action against him.
      “It’s absolutely appalling. What have we gotten ourselves into? And where have we reached as a nation?” said the actress Padukone, who plays the leading role of Queen Padmavati and who recently appeared in “XXX: Return of Xander Cage” alongside Vin Diesel.
      “We have regressed,” she added. “The only people we are answerable to is the censor board, and I know and I believe that nothing can stop the release of this film.”
      A member of the Rajput Karni Sena group, Mahipal Singh Makrana, responded in a self-made video, saying, “Rajputs never raise a hand on women, but if need be, we will do to Deepika what Lakshman did to Surpanakha,” referring to a Hindu epic in which a man cuts off a woman's nose. The group has also vandalized cinemas, burned posters and threatened to break the legsof actor Ranveer Singh, who plays villainous Muslim invader Alauddin Khilji.
      The violent reaction to the film's release further suggests a groundswell of conservatism in Modi's India. Bollywood films in the 2000s were known for breaking taboos, as they increasingly began to show on-screen kissing, live-in relationships between unmarried couples and interreligious romances, most famously in the 2008 historical drama "Jodhaa Akbar."







      Some members of Modi's party have made efforts to minimize Muslims' role Indian culture and history. Recently, members of the governing party misleadingly said that the Taj Mahal was built on the site of an old Hindu temple and that it “did not represent Indian culture.” The Taj Mahal was built by the Muslim Mughal king Shah Jahan.
      Alhough members of right-wing groups have been briefly arrested for making threats in thepast, the government rarely pursues legal action against them.
      Ironically, the movie's trailer shows no sign of an interreligious romance and depicts the Muslim king as brutish and evil.
      Bhansali issued a video statement saying that the protests were caused by a misunderstanding and that there was no romance between the Muslim king and the Hindu queen. “We have made this film very responsibly, keeping in mind the Rajput dignity and respect. I would like to reiterate once again that our film has no dream sequence between Rani Padmavati and Alauddin Khilji or any other scene which will hurt anyone,” he said.

      Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/11/20/indian-ruling-party-member-offers-bounty-for-the-beheading-of-bollywoods-biggest-female-stars/
      ------------------------------

      Some people need to chill, for starters


    2. #38

      ----
       


      Join Date
      Dec 4, 2016
      Posts
      403
      Post Thanks / Like
      Mentioned
      26 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Yo what is this movie about and why are people trying to kill the actress in?!? I don't plan to watch the movie so I don't mind spoilers.

    3. #39

      High
       

      IsaidwhatIsaid's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 13, 2017
      Location
      The South
      Posts
      300
      Post Thanks / Like
      Blogs
      1
      Mentioned
      3 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quote Originally Posted by third string View Post
      Yo what is this movie about and why are people trying to kill the actress in?!? I don't plan to watch the movie so I don't mind spoilers.
      It hasn't come out yet, but is pretty much an based off of an epic from the 1500s where a Muslim king invades a Rajput kingdom to capture the Queen of the kingdom. Controversy surrounding this movie isn't new since the director did actually get physically attacked because of it some time ago. Basically people are getting mad as hell because they think that Bhansali's depiction of Padmavati is dishonoring their culture. They think Deepika's outfits are too revealing and that her character dancing in the movie is also scandalous. There were even rumors about of there being a "dream sequence" where Padmavati and the Muslim king Khilji/Khalji are getting physical or something like that, which Bhansali denied putting into the movie. Add in the political climate of India and you get this disaster.

    4. #40

      High
       

      IsaidwhatIsaid's Avatar
      Join Date
      Oct 13, 2017
      Location
      The South
      Posts
      300
      Post Thanks / Like
      Blogs
      1
      Mentioned
      3 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      The extremist losers getting salty about this movie is hilarious. This movie is still essentially glorifying the idea of a woman pretty much killing herself to preserve honor and there apparently aren't even scenes between Ranveer and Deepika. This entire movie is glorifying the juvenile "savage Muslim" and "noble Rajput" dichotomy as well as the "honor preserving" self immolation and these people are getting buttmad about her dancing (as if this is not Bollywood) lmfao!

    5. #41
      Ahjussi
      Hungry
       

      queer's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 5, 1999
      Location
      CA 90210
      Posts
      27,718
      Post Thanks / Like
      Blogs
      77
      Mentioned
      170 Post(s)
      Tagged
      1 Thread(s)
      It is close to election time in India, and anything that can be communalized will be communalized. The story was written by Malik Mohammad Jayasi centuries ago. Rajputs who were for much of history allies of muslim rulers in Delhi and often married their women off to Mughals (most of the latter mughal kings were more rajput than mughal by blood) had no issues with the Padmavati until now, in Modi's India. Where growth rate has plummeted, corruption hasnt, and new campaign issues are being created on the basis of castes and religion.
      Simple ain't easy.